The Tecno Camon 18P and Motorola Moto G60S represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive sub-$250 smartphone market. Both leverage Mediatek’s Helio G-series, aiming to deliver a balance of performance and affordability. However, key differences in charging speed and subtle chipset variations dictate which phone is best suited for different users.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid replenishment, the Motorola Moto G60S is the better choice thanks to its 50W charging with Quick Charge 4 support. While the Tecno Camon 18P offers a comparable processor, the slower 33W charging is a noticeable drawback in a world demanding faster turnaround times.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 40, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 04 | 2021, August 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 14 | Available. Released 2021, August 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.9 x 76.7 x 8.8 mm (6.65 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 169.7 x 75.9 x 9.6 mm (6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| | - | Water repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ), 562 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, HIOS 8.0 | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
13 MP, 45mm (telephoto), PDAF, 1.7x optical zoom
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 50W wired, QC4 |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dusk Gray, Ceramic White, Iris purple | Green, Blue |
| Models | CH7n, CH7 | XT2133-2, XT2133-1 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 200 EUR |
Tecno Camon 18 P
- Potentially slightly better CPU performance with Helio G96
- Likely competitive pricing
- Standard Android experience (assuming minimal Tecno UI bloat)
- Slower 33W charging
- No Quick Charge support
- Display likely lacks high refresh rate
Motorola Moto G60S
- Faster 50W charging with Quick Charge 4
- Potentially better power efficiency with Helio G95
- Convenience of QC4 compatibility
- Slightly older chipset (Helio G95)
- Display likely lacks high refresh rate
- Motorola’s software can include some bloatware
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both are likely utilizing IPS LCD panels, a common choice in this price bracket. While specific details like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are unavailable, the focus here is on functionality rather than visual fidelity. Bezels are expected to be moderate, prioritizing screen real estate without aiming for flagship-level immersion. The absence of high refresh rate panels is also typical for this segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor specifications, a direct camera comparison is challenging. However, the market positioning suggests both phones will feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially macro/depth sensors. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is expected on both. Image processing will likely lean towards vibrant colors and boosted contrast, typical of Tecno and Motorola’s software tuning. The quality of the main sensor will be the determining factor, and without specific megapixel counts or sensor sizes, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner.
Performance
Both the Tecno Camon 18P (Helio G96) and Motorola Moto G60S (Helio G95) employ an octa-core CPU configuration with the same core arrangement: 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. The Helio G96 in the Camon 18P offers a slight theoretical advantage due to marginally higher clock speeds in some configurations, but real-world performance differences will likely be minimal for most users. Both chipsets are built on a 12nm process, meaning thermal throttling under sustained load is a possibility, particularly during extended gaming sessions. The G95’s slightly older architecture may result in marginally better power efficiency, but this is unlikely to be a significant factor.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G60S significantly pulls ahead in the battery and charging department. While the exact battery capacity isn’t specified, the inclusion of 50W wired charging with Quick Charge 4 (QC4) support is a major advantage. This translates to significantly faster 0-100% charging times compared to the Tecno Camon 18P’s 33W charging. Even if the Camon 18P has a slightly larger battery capacity, the G60S’s faster charging will likely result in less downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 18P if you prioritize a consistently smooth experience with everyday tasks and aren’t heavily reliant on extremely fast charging. It’s ideal for users who charge overnight or don’t mind topping up less frequently. Buy the Motorola Moto G60S if you need to quickly get back up and running, frequently find yourself needing a boost during the day, and appreciate the convenience of Quick Charge compatibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Motorola Moto G60S overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Mediatek Helio G95, while capable, is built on a 12nm process. This means it can generate heat under sustained load, like extended gaming. While Motorola’s thermal management is generally adequate, some throttling is possible to prevent overheating. Expect performance to dip slightly after 30-60 minutes of intensive gaming.
❓ Does the Tecno Camon 18P support reverse charging?
Based on typical specifications for phones in this price range, it's unlikely the Tecno Camon 18P supports reverse wireless or wired charging. This feature is usually reserved for higher-end models. The 33W charger is likely intended for charging the phone itself only.
❓ Is the Quick Charge 4 support on the Moto G60S a significant advantage?
Yes, Quick Charge 4 compatibility is a substantial benefit. It allows the Moto G60S to leverage a wider range of chargers for faster charging speeds, and it's more efficient than standard USB-PD charging at this power level. This means you can quickly top up your phone using compatible chargers you might already own or easily purchase.
