The Tecno Camon 17P and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Camon 17P focuses on providing a balanced experience at an accessible price point, while the Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) aims for a more performance-driven experience, leveraging a significantly more powerful chipset. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and fast charging, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 1100 chipset offers a substantial leap in processing power, and the 67W charging dramatically reduces downtime. However, the Tecno Camon 17P remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget who value efficiency.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 08 | 2021, May 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 28 | Available. Released 2021, June 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.7 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.64 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 500 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, HIOS 7.6 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Single | 16 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | Yes | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Frost Sliver, Magnet Black, Spruce Green | Stargaze Black, Wave Blue, Cloud White |
| Models | CG7, CG7n | - |
| Price | About 210 EUR | About 200 EUR |
Tecno Camon 17P
- More affordable price point
- Potentially longer battery life due to efficient chipset
- Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks
- Significantly slower charging speed
- Limited performance for demanding apps and games
- Less future-proof chipset
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China)
- Blazing-fast 67W charging
- Superior performance with the Dimensity 1100
- Better multitasking and gaming capabilities
- Higher price tag
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load
- May run warmer during intensive tasks
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature LCD panels (data not provided), the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. Display quality is likely similar, but the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s chipset will handle graphically intensive tasks like video playback and gaming with greater ease. Bezels and color accuracy are unknown, but the chipset difference will be more impactful for the user experience.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Dimensity 1100 chipset will likely result in better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. The chipset’s ability to handle complex algorithms for noise reduction and dynamic range enhancement will give it an edge. We can assume both phones will feature multiple lenses, but the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s processing power will likely elevate the overall camera experience.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) boasts the Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6nm), featuring four high-performance Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz, compared to the Tecno Camon 17P’s Helio G85 (12nm) with its two Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 1100 translates to significantly improved power efficiency and thermal management, allowing for sustained performance under load. The Redmi Note 10 Pro will excel in multitasking, gaming, and demanding applications, while the Camon 17P will be adequate for everyday use but may struggle with resource-intensive tasks.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s 67W charging is a game-changer, promising a full charge in just 42 minutes. This is a massive advantage over the Tecno Camon 17P’s 18W charging. While the Camon 17P might have a slightly larger battery capacity (data not provided, but typical for the segment), the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s rapid charging effectively mitigates any potential battery life concerns. The Dimensity 1100’s 6nm process also contributes to better power efficiency, partially offsetting the increased power draw.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 17P if you need a reliable daily driver for basic tasks, social media, and light gaming, and prioritize battery life over peak performance. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) if you prefer a smoother experience with demanding apps, enjoy mobile gaming, and value the convenience of incredibly fast charging – even if it means slightly reduced battery longevity due to the more powerful processor.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 1100 in the Redmi Note 10 Pro overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 1100 is a powerful chip, its 6nm process node and Xiaomi’s thermal management solutions (likely including graphite sheets and heat pipes) are designed to mitigate overheating. Expect some warmth, but not to the point of significant throttling during typical gaming sessions. The Camon 17P's Helio G85 will run cooler, but at the cost of performance.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the Tecno Camon 17P slow enough to be a major inconvenience?
Yes, 18W charging is considerably slower than the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 10 Pro. Expect a full charge to take well over two hours, which can be frustrating for users accustomed to faster charging speeds. This is a key trade-off for the Camon 17P’s lower price.
❓ Can the Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) run demanding games like Genshin Impact at high settings?
The Dimensity 1100 is capable of running Genshin Impact, but achieving consistently high frame rates at maximum settings may require some optimization. Expect to play at medium to high settings with stable performance. The Camon 17P would struggle to maintain playable frame rates in such a demanding title.
