The Tecno Camon 17P and Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro represent distinct approaches to the budget smartphone market. The Camon 17P focuses on providing a functional, everyday experience, while the Poco X3 Pro aggressively targets gamers with a more powerful chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right phone for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 860 chipset delivers significantly better performance, making it ideal for gaming and demanding applications. While the Tecno Camon 17P offers a reasonable experience for basic tasks, the Poco X3 Pro’s power justifies the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 08 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 28 | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.7 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.64 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 500 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 11, HIOS 7.6 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lenses | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | Yes | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Frost Sliver, Magnet Black, Spruce Green | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | CG7, CG7n | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 210 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Camon 17P
- Lower price point makes it accessible.
- Decent battery life for basic usage.
- Functional for everyday tasks.
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Poco X3 Pro.
- Slower charging speed.
- Limited camera details suggest a basic setup.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 860 chipset for gaming and multitasking.
- Fast 33W wired charging.
- Superior thermal management.
- Higher price compared to the Tecno Camon 17P.
- Camera performance isn't class-leading.
- May be overkill for basic users.
Display Comparison
Both phones share a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, detailed display specs like brightness and resolution are missing for the Camon 17P. The Poco X3 Pro’s display, while not explicitly detailed beyond contrast, benefits from the overall higher processing power to drive smoother visuals. Without knowing the Camon 17P’s peak brightness, it’s difficult to assess outdoor visibility, but the X3 Pro is likely superior in this regard given its higher-end positioning.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details for the Camon 17P, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. The Poco X3 Pro, while not a camera champion, benefits from the Snapdragon 860’s image signal processor (ISP), which enables faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The absence of details on the Camon 17P’s camera suggests it’s likely a more basic setup focused on everyday snapshots.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Poco X3 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Tecno Camon 17P’s MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm). The Snapdragon 860’s Kryo 485 cores, with a prime core clocked at 2.96 GHz, offer significantly faster processing speeds and improved efficiency compared to the G85’s Cortex-A75 and A55 cores. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a far superior gaming experience. The 7nm process node of the Snapdragon 860 also contributes to better thermal management, reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 112 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Poco X3 Pro’s 33W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Camon 17P’s 18W charging. The X3 Pro can reach 59% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 59 minutes, minimizing downtime. While the Camon 17P’s battery life may be similar, the slower charging speed is a notable drawback for users who need a quick power boost.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 17P if you prioritize a lower price point and primarily need a phone for basic communication, social media, and light web browsing. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro if you’re a mobile gamer, frequently multitask, or want a phone that will remain responsive for years to come. The X3 Pro’s superior processing power and faster charging are worth the investment for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco X3 Pro run demanding games like Genshin Impact smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 860 in the Poco X3 Pro is capable of running Genshin Impact at medium to high settings with playable frame rates. While it won't match the performance of flagship chips, it provides a significantly better gaming experience than the Helio G85 in the Camon 17P.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the Tecno Camon 17P slow enough to be a major inconvenience?
For casual users, 18W charging is adequate. However, compared to the Poco X3 Pro’s 33W charging, it will take considerably longer to fully charge the device. If you frequently find yourself needing to quickly top up your battery, the slower charging speed of the Camon 17P could be frustrating.
❓ Does the Poco X3 Pro get excessively hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 860, while powerful, is known for its relatively efficient thermal performance. The Poco X3 Pro incorporates thermal management features to mitigate overheating, but some warmth is expected during extended gaming. It's less prone to significant throttling than devices with less efficient chipsets.
❓ How does the Helio G85 in the Camon 17P handle multitasking compared to the Snapdragon 860?
The Helio G85 is sufficient for basic multitasking, such as switching between messaging apps and web browsing. However, the Snapdragon 860 in the Poco X3 Pro handles more demanding multitasking scenarios, like running multiple apps simultaneously or editing photos/videos, with significantly greater ease and responsiveness.
