The Tecno Camon 17P and Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they diverge significantly in their core components, particularly in chipset and processing power. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device best suits your needs and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset delivers significantly faster performance and smoother multitasking, justifying the potential price premium. However, the Tecno Camon 17P offers a viable alternative for those prioritizing affordability and basic functionality.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 08 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 28 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.7 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.64 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 500 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, HIOS 7.6 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lenses | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | Yes | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Frost Sliver, Magnet Black, Spruce Green | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | CG7, CG7n | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 210 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9)
GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Camon 17P
- Significantly more affordable
- Decent battery life (113h endurance)
- Acceptable for basic smartphone tasks
- Underpowered Helio G85 chipset
- Slower 18W charging
- Likely inferior camera performance
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Powerful Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset
- Faster 25W charging
- Brighter and smoother display (120Hz)
- Superior camera capabilities
- Higher price point
- May be slightly heavier than the Camon 17P
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 800 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Camon 17P. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays likely utilize AMOLED technology (based on Samsung's typical implementation), the A52s 5G’s 'Infinite' contrast ratio suggests deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. The absence of refresh rate data for the Camon 17P suggests it likely operates at a standard 60Hz, while the A52s 5G is known to support 120Hz, resulting in smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is expected to deliver superior image quality due to its more advanced image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 778G. While specific sensor details are missing for both, Samsung typically employs larger sensors and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The A52s 5G likely benefits from features like optical image stabilization (OIS), which is crucial for sharp photos and stable videos, especially in low-light conditions. The Camon 17P’s camera performance will likely be adequate for casual photography, but will struggle in challenging lighting scenarios.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) is a significant leap ahead of the Tecno Camon 17P’s MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm). The Snapdragon 778G features a more modern CPU architecture – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores – compared to the Camon 17P’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon also contributes to better power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling during sustained workloads. This means the A52s 5G will handle demanding games and applications with greater ease and consistency.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G’s 25W wired charging is significantly faster than the Tecno Camon 17P’s 18W charging. This translates to quicker top-ups, reducing downtime. While the Camon 17P might offer similar overall battery capacity, the faster charging of the A52s 5G provides a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 17P if you need a highly affordable smartphone for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and aren't concerned with demanding gaming or intensive applications. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you prioritize a responsive user experience, capable gaming performance, and a more versatile camera system, and are willing to invest a bit more for a smoother, more future-proof device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Helio G85 in the Tecno Camon 17P capable of running demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
While the Helio G85 can technically run these games, expect to make significant compromises in graphics settings and frame rates. You'll likely experience noticeable lag and stuttering, especially during intense action sequences. The A52s 5G's Snapdragon 778G is far better suited for a smooth gaming experience.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G support carrier aggregation for faster 5G speeds?
Yes, the Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset in the A52s 5G supports carrier aggregation, allowing it to combine multiple 5G channels for significantly faster download and upload speeds, provided your carrier supports it. This is a key advantage for users in areas with strong 5G coverage.
❓ How does the camera processing differ between the Tecno Camon 17P and the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G?
Samsung's image processing tends to produce vibrant, saturated images with a focus on detail. The Tecno Camon 17P likely employs a more natural processing style, potentially resulting in less visually striking but more accurate colors. The A52s 5G's superior ISP also enables more advanced features like night mode and HDR.
❓ What type of charging protocol does each phone use, and are they compatible with Power Delivery (PD) chargers?
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G supports 25W USB Power Delivery (PD) charging. The Tecno Camon 17P uses a proprietary 18W charging protocol, and compatibility with PD chargers may be limited or non-existent. Using a non-compatible charger may result in slower charging speeds.
