The Tecno Camon 17P and Oppo Reno 5G represent different approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Camon 17P focuses on affordability, while the Reno 5G, though older, leverages a more powerful chipset from a previous generation. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and 5G connectivity, the Oppo Reno 5G is the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 855, built on a 7nm process, delivers a noticeable performance advantage over the Camon 17P’s Helio G85, despite the Reno 5G’s age. However, the Camon 17P remains a viable option for budget-conscious buyers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 78 NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 08 | 2019, April. Released 2019, May |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 28 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 168.7 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.64 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 162 x 77.2 x 9.3 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 500 nits (HBM) | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 11, HIOS 7.6 | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Single | 16 MP | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/3.0, 130mm (periscope telephoto), 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | Yes | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4065 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Frost Sliver, Magnet Black, Spruce Green | Ocean Green, Jet Black |
| Models | CG7, CG7n | CPH1921 |
| Price | About 210 EUR | About 880 EUR |
Tecno Camon 17P
- More affordable price point
- Potentially longer battery life due to less powerful chipset
- Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Reno 5G
- Less capable camera system
- Limited 5G support
Oppo Reno 5G
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 855
- Faster charging with 20W support
- Better camera capabilities and image processing
- Higher price compared to the Camon 17P
- Older chipset, potentially limited software updates
- May experience more heat under heavy load
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Reno 5G's positioning, it likely features a higher-quality panel with better color accuracy and potentially a higher refresh rate. The Camon 17P, being a more budget-oriented device, likely utilizes a standard 60Hz LCD. The Reno 5G's potential for AMOLED technology would also offer superior contrast ratios.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the Reno 5G, being a Reno series device, likely prioritizes camera quality with a more sophisticated image processing pipeline. The Snapdragon 855’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is more advanced than the Helio G85’s, enabling better dynamic range and noise reduction. While both phones likely feature multiple rear cameras, the Reno 5G is more likely to include features like optical image stabilization (OIS) on its main sensor, resulting in sharper photos and videos. The Camon 17P likely relies more on software enhancements to compensate for a less capable sensor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (7nm) significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 17P’s MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm). The Snapdragon 855’s Kryo 485 cores, with a peak clock speed of 2.84 GHz, offer a substantial advantage in both single-core and multi-core performance. The 7nm fabrication process also translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While the Helio G85 is adequate for everyday tasks, the Snapdragon 855 provides a smoother experience for gaming and demanding applications. The Reno 5G's Adreno 640 GPU also dwarfs the Helio G85's integrated GPU.
Battery Life
The Tecno Camon 17P features 18W wired charging, while the Oppo Reno 5G supports 20W wired charging. While the difference is modest, the Reno 5G will likely charge slightly faster. Battery capacity isn't specified for either device, but the Reno 5G's more efficient Snapdragon 855 chipset could potentially offset a smaller battery capacity, offering comparable or even better real-world battery life. The 7nm process contributes to lower power consumption compared to the Helio G85's 12nm process.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 17P if you need a highly affordable smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, social media, and light web browsing, and aren't concerned with demanding games or future-proofing. Buy the Oppo Reno 5G if you prioritize smoother multitasking, better gaming performance, and 5G connectivity, and are willing to spend a bit more for a more capable device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 855 in the Oppo Reno 5G still be able to handle modern games?
Yes, the Snapdragon 855 remains a capable chipset for gaming, even in 2024. While it won't match the performance of the latest flagship chips, it can comfortably run most popular titles at medium to high settings. The Adreno 640 GPU is a key factor in its gaming prowess.
❓ Is the Helio G85 in the Tecno Camon 17P sufficient for everyday social media and browsing?
Absolutely. The Helio G85 is designed for efficient performance in everyday tasks. You'll have no issues with social media, web browsing, email, and video streaming. However, expect some slowdowns when multitasking heavily or running demanding applications.
❓ How much of a difference will the 5G connectivity on the Oppo Reno 5G make in real-world usage?
The benefit of 5G depends heavily on your location and carrier coverage. If you live in an area with robust 5G infrastructure, you'll experience significantly faster download and upload speeds compared to 4G LTE. However, if 5G coverage is limited, the difference may be negligible.
❓ Does the Oppo Reno 5G support software updates, considering its age?
Software update support for the Oppo Reno 5G is likely nearing its end. While it may still receive security patches, major Android version updates are unlikely. This is a trade-off for choosing an older device, but it doesn't necessarily render it unusable.
