The Motorola Moto G60S and Tecno Camon 17P represent compelling options in the crowded budget and mid-range smartphone market. While both devices utilize Mediatek’s Helio series of chipsets, they diverge significantly in charging speed and processing power, creating a clear distinction for potential buyers. This comparison will dissect these differences, helping you determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G60S is the superior choice. Its Helio G95 chipset provides a noticeable performance boost over the Camon 17P’s Helio G85, and the inclusion of 50W fast charging with Quick Charge 4 support dramatically reduces downtime. The Camon 17P remains a viable option for those prioritizing extreme affordability.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 40, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 08 | 2021, August 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 28 | Available. Released 2021, August 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.7 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.64 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 169.7 x 75.9 x 9.6 mm (6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| | - | Water repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 500 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ), 562 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, HIOS 7.6 | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lenses | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | Yes | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 50W wired, QC4 |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Frost Sliver, Magnet Black, Spruce Green | Green, Blue |
| Models | CG7, CG7n | XT2133-2, XT2133-1 |
| Price | About 210 EUR | About 200 EUR |
Tecno Camon 17P
- More affordable price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Acceptable performance for light use
- Significantly slower charging
- Less powerful processor
- Likely limited gaming performance
Motorola Moto G60S
- Faster and more powerful processor (Helio G95)
- 50W fast charging with Quick Charge 4
- Better multitasking and gaming capabilities
- Higher price compared to the Camon 17P
- May not offer significant camera improvements
- Potentially larger physical size
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific panel details (like LCD vs. AMOLED) are missing, both rely on 12nm process chipsets, suggesting a focus on cost optimization over premium display features. The absence of high refresh rates or advanced technologies like LTPO indicates a similar level of display quality. Bezels are likely comparable, given the price points, and color accuracy will likely be standard for this segment. The real difference will be in peak brightness, which is not specified, but the G60S's more powerful chipset *could* allow for slightly better display driving.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. However, the G95’s image signal processor (ISP) is likely more capable than the G85’s, potentially leading to better image processing, especially in low-light conditions. The G60S’s more powerful chipset could also support faster image capture and more advanced computational photography features. It’s reasonable to assume Motorola would prioritize camera software optimization on the G60S, given its positioning. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests they are largely marketing features and offer limited practical benefit.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G60S holds a clear advantage in performance. Its Mediatek Helio G95 chipset, featuring a dual-core configuration of Cortex-A76 processors clocked at 2.05 GHz, outperforms the Tecno Camon 17P’s Helio G85 (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55). The Cortex-A76 cores in the G95 offer a significant architectural improvement over the A75 cores in the G85, resulting in faster single-core performance. While both use 12nm fabrication, the G95’s core design translates to a more responsive user experience, particularly in demanding applications and games. The G60S is better suited for users who multitask frequently or enjoy mobile gaming.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G60S truly shines with its 50W wired charging, supported by Quick Charge 4. This drastically reduces charging times compared to the Tecno Camon 17P’s 18W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the G60S mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. A full charge on the G60S is likely to take under an hour, while the Camon 17P will require significantly longer. This difference is crucial for users who rely heavily on their smartphones throughout the day and need quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 17P if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. Buy the Motorola Moto G60S if you prioritize smoother multitasking, occasional gaming, and significantly faster charging, even if it means spending a bit more. The G60S is the better choice for users who value time savings and a more responsive experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Motorola Moto G60S get noticeably warmer during extended gaming sessions compared to the Tecno Camon 17P?
The Moto G60S, with its more powerful Helio G95, is likely to generate more heat under sustained load. However, Motorola’s thermal management solutions are generally more effective than those found in Tecno devices, potentially mitigating the impact. The G85 in the Camon 17P will throttle performance sooner to manage heat, resulting in a less consistent gaming experience.
❓ Is the 50W charging on the Moto G60S compatible with all USB-C chargers?
While the Moto G60S supports Quick Charge 4, achieving the full 50W charging speed requires a compatible Quick Charge 4 power adapter. Standard USB-C Power Delivery (PD) chargers will still charge the device, but at a slower rate. Using the included charger is recommended for optimal charging speeds.
❓ Can the Tecno Camon 17P handle popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Camon 17P can *run* these games, but likely at lower graphics settings and frame rates to maintain playable performance. The Helio G85 is not a gaming-focused chipset, and you may experience stuttering or lag during intense gameplay. The Moto G60S is the better choice for a smoother gaming experience.
