The Tecno Camon 17 and Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro represent distinct approaches to the budget smartphone market. The Camon 17 focuses on providing a well-rounded experience at a lower price point, while the Poco X3 Pro prioritizes raw performance, particularly for gaming. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 860 chipset delivers significantly faster performance, making it ideal for gaming and demanding applications. While the Tecno Camon 17 offers a more affordable entry point, the performance gap is substantial.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 08 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 22 | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 76.5 x 9 mm (6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 11, HIOS 7.6 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | Yes | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Frost Sliver, Deep Sea, Tranquil Green | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | CG6, CG6j | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 160 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Camon 17
- More affordable price point
- Decent battery endurance
- Suitable for basic smartphone tasks
- Significantly weaker performance compared to Poco X3 Pro
- Slower charging speed
- Limited detailed specifications available
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 860 processor
- Faster 33W charging
- Better suited for gaming and demanding apps
- Higher price tag
- Camera details are limited
- May run slightly warmer under heavy load
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, detailed display specs like resolution, refresh rate, and peak brightness are missing for the Tecno Camon 17. The Poco X3 Pro’s display, while not explicitly detailed beyond the contrast ratio, benefits from the chipset’s ability to drive higher refresh rates, potentially offering a smoother visual experience. Without knowing the Camon 17’s panel technology, it’s difficult to assess its color accuracy or viewing angles relative to the Poco.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture information, or image processing details for the Tecno Camon 17, a direct comparison is challenging. The Poco X3 Pro, while also lacking detailed camera specs, benefits from the Snapdragon 860’s image signal processor (ISP), which generally delivers better image quality and faster processing speeds. The absence of information on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) for either device suggests both rely on digital stabilization, potentially resulting in less stable video recording.
Performance
The performance disparity is the most significant difference. The Poco X3 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Tecno Camon 17’s MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm). The Snapdragon 860’s Kryo 485 cores, with a prime core clocked at 2.96 GHz, offer significantly faster processing speeds and improved efficiency compared to the Helio G85’s Cortex-A75 and A55 configuration. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a far superior gaming experience on the Poco X3 Pro. The 7nm process node also contributes to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 112 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Poco X3 Pro’s 33W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Tecno Camon 17’s 18W charging. The Poco X3 Pro can reach 59% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 59 minutes, minimizing downtime. The slower charging speed of the Camon 17 means users will be tethered to a charger for a longer period to achieve a full charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 17 if you prioritize affordability and a balanced feature set for everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and light photography. You'll appreciate its lower price tag and adequate performance for non-intensive use. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro if you're a mobile gamer or frequently use resource-heavy apps. The Snapdragon 860 provides a noticeable performance boost, justifying the higher cost for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco X3 Pro's Snapdragon 860 handle demanding games like Genshin Impact and Call of Duty Mobile?
Yes, the Snapdragon 860 is well-equipped to handle demanding games. While it won't deliver the absolute highest frame rates at maximum settings, it provides a smooth and enjoyable gaming experience, especially when paired with optimized game settings. The Helio G85 in the Tecno Camon 17 will struggle with these titles.
❓ How much faster is the Poco X3 Pro's charging compared to the Tecno Camon 17 in real-world use?
The Poco X3 Pro's 33W charging is significantly faster. You can expect to gain approximately 60% battery in 30 minutes, and a full charge in under an hour. The Tecno Camon 17's 18W charging will take considerably longer – likely over 2 hours for a full charge – making it less convenient for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specifications for the Tecno Camon 17 a major concern?
Yes, it is. Without knowing the sensor size, aperture, or image processing capabilities, it's difficult to assess the Camon 17's camera performance. While it may be adequate for casual snapshots, it's unlikely to compete with the image quality offered by phones with more advanced camera systems, like the Poco X3 Pro (even with its limited specs).
