Tecno continues to deliver budget-friendly smartphones with impressive features. The Camon 17 Pro and Camon 18 P are two popular contenders, each offering a unique set of strengths. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which phone best suits your needs and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Camon 18 P offers a slightly more modern chipset and faster charging, but the 17 Pro boasts significantly longer battery life and a brighter display. Ultimately, the 17 Pro is the better choice for battery-focused users, while the 18 P caters to those prioritizing charging speed and a newer processor.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 08 | 2021, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 03 | Available. Released 2021, December 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 168.9 x 77 x 9 mm (6.65 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) | 168.9 x 76.7 x 8.8 mm (6.65 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 500 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, HIOS 7.6 | Android 11, HIOS 8.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | Unspecified |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (monochrome)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 48 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
13 MP, 45mm (telephoto), PDAF, 1.7x optical zoom
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 48 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 25W / 33W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | California Silver, Malibu Blue | Dusk Gray, Ceramic White, Iris purple |
| Models | CG8, CG8h | CH7n, CH7 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 140h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 781:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-24.4 LUFS (Very good)
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 309107 (v8)
GeekBench: 1668 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
- Exceptional Battery Life (140h Endurance)
- Brighter Display (538 nits)
- Good Value for Money
- Slightly Older Chipset (Helio G95)
- Charging Speed Not as Fast (25W/33W)
Tecno Camon 18 P
- Slightly Newer Chipset (Helio G96)
- Faster Charging (33W)
- Potentially Improved Performance
- Less Impressive Battery Life
- Display Brightness Unknown
- May Lack Some Features of the 17 Pro
Display Comparison
The Camon 17 Pro takes the lead in display quality. It boasts a measured peak brightness of 538 nits and a contrast ratio of 781:1, offering a more vibrant and easily viewable screen, especially outdoors. The Camon 18 P's display is likely comparable but lacks the brightness data to confirm.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are marketed as camera-centric devices, but detailed camera specifications are missing. We can assume both offer a multi-lens setup with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a macro or depth sensor. Image quality will likely be similar, with both capable of producing decent photos in good lighting conditions. Low-light performance will be a key differentiator to test.
Performance
While both phones utilize a Mediatek Helio processor with the same CPU core configuration, the Camon 18 P features the Helio G96, a slightly newer and potentially more efficient chipset compared to the 17 Pro's Helio G95. This could translate to marginally better performance in demanding tasks, though real-world differences are likely minimal.
Battery Life
The Camon 17 Pro shines in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 140 hours. This is a significant advantage over the Camon 18 P, which, while offering 33W fast charging, likely has a smaller battery capacity. Users who prioritize all-day (or multi-day) battery life will strongly favor the 17 Pro.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Tecno Camon 17 Pro? Users prioritizing exceptional battery life and a vibrant display will find the 17 Pro appealing. Who should buy the Tecno Camon 18 P? Those seeking a slightly newer chipset and faster charging speeds, and who don't mind a less impressive battery, should consider the 18 P.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Tecno Camon 18 P worth the upgrade from the Camon 17 Pro?
It depends on your priorities. If you value faster charging and a slightly newer chipset, the 18 P is a reasonable upgrade. However, if battery life is paramount, the 17 Pro remains the better choice.
❓ What are the camera capabilities of each phone?
Both phones feature multi-lens camera systems, but detailed specifications are limited. Expect decent image quality in good lighting, but low-light performance will require further testing to determine a clear winner.
