Tecno Camon 16 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Lite: A Detailed Comparison

The Tecno Camon 16 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Lite represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, they take different approaches, primarily centered around their chipset choices. This comparison dives deep into the nuances of the Mediatek Helio G70 versus the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, and how that impacts real-world performance and user experience.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing overall performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Lite is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 720G, built on a more efficient 8nm process, offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Tecno Camon 16’s Helio G70, especially in demanding tasks and gaming. However, the Camon 16 remains a viable option for users focused on basic functionality.

PHONES
Phone Names Tecno Camon 16 Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Lite
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2020, October 10. Released 2020, October 162021, October 01
StatusDiscontinuedAvailable. Released 2021, October 02
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame
Dimensions170.9 x 77.2 x 9.2 mm (6.73 x 3.04 x 0.36 in)165.8 x 76.7 x 8.8 mm (6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight207 g (7.30 oz)209 g (7.37 oz)
 -Water-repellent coating
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution720 x 1640 pixels (~263 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)
Size6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio)6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 480 nits (typ)IPS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver)
ChipsetMediatek MT6769V/CB Helio G70 (12 nm)Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm)
GPUMali-G52 2EEMC2Adreno 618
OSAndroid 10, HIOS 6.0Android 10, MIUI 11
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesPenta-LED flash, panorama, HDRLED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad64 MP, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lenses48 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF Auxiliary lens
Single-16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
Video1440p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesDual-LED flash, HDRHDR, panorama
Single16 MP, (wide), AF16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP, LE
Infrared port-Yes
NFCNoYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC
RadioFM radioFM radio, recording
USBmicroUSB 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging-18W wired
Type5000 mAhLi-Po 5020 mAh
Misc
ColorsCloud White, Purist Blue, Misty GreyAurora Blue, Glacier White, Interstellar Black, Champagne Gold
ModelsCE7, CE7j, CE9h, MZ-TECNO CE7jM2002F4LG
PriceAbout 130 EURAbout 200 EUR
SAR0.95 W/kg (head)     0.82 W/kg (body)1.17 W/kg (head)     0.86 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-1.01 W/kg (head)     1.39 W/kg (body)

Tecno Camon 16

  • Potentially lower price point
  • Functional for basic smartphone tasks
  • May offer unique software features specific to Tecno

  • Inferior chipset performance
  • Less efficient power consumption
  • Slower charging speeds (likely)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Lite

  • Superior chipset performance (Snapdragon 720G)
  • More efficient power consumption
  • Faster 18W wired charging

  • Potentially higher price point
  • May have less aggressive marketing in some regions
  • Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be polarizing

Display Comparison

Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. While specific details like peak brightness and color accuracy are unavailable, the focus here is on the underlying processing power needed to drive a high-refresh-rate panel – a feature absent on both. The Redmi Note 10 Lite’s chipset is more capable of handling demanding display tasks should a future software update enable higher refresh rates. Bezels are likely comparable given the market segment, and both will likely utilize IPS LCD technology.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is difficult. However, the chipset plays a crucial role in image processing. The Snapdragon 720G’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is more advanced, enabling faster processing, better noise reduction, and improved dynamic range. While both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, the Redmi Note 10 Lite will likely deliver superior image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The presence of a more powerful ISP also aids in video recording capabilities.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Lite’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8nm) significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16’s Mediatek Helio G70 (12nm). The 8nm process inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and sustained performance. The Snapdragon 720G’s Kryo 465 Gold cores, clocked at 2.3 GHz, provide a clear advantage over the Helio G70’s 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. This difference is particularly noticeable in graphically intensive games and multitasking. The Redmi Note 10 Lite will exhibit less throttling under sustained load.

Battery Life

The Redmi Note 10 Lite benefits from 18W wired charging, a feature absent or less prominent on the Tecno Camon 16 (specific charging speed unavailable). While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the Snapdragon 720G’s superior power efficiency means the Redmi Note 10 Lite will likely achieve comparable or better battery life despite potentially having a similar or smaller battery capacity. The 18W charging will also significantly reduce charging times, offering a more convenient user experience.

Buying Guide

Buy the Tecno Camon 16 if you need a functional smartphone for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and prioritize a potentially lower price point. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Lite if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience, enjoy mobile gaming, and value the benefits of a more efficient chipset and faster charging capabilities.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Redmi Note 10 Lite’s Snapdragon 720G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 720G is well-equipped to handle PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. Its Adreno 618 GPU provides sufficient graphical power, and the 8nm process minimizes throttling during extended gaming sessions. Expect a smoother and more consistent gaming experience compared to the Tecno Camon 16.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance between the Helio G70 and Snapdragon 720G noticeable in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
While both phones will handle basic tasks adequately, the Snapdragon 720G offers a noticeably smoother and more responsive experience. App launch times will be faster, multitasking will be more fluid, and animations will appear less laggy. The difference is subtle for casual users, but becomes apparent with frequent app switching and heavier usage.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 10 Lite support fast charging, and how long does it take to fully charge?
The Redmi Note 10 Lite supports 18W fast charging. While the exact 0-100% charge time will vary depending on usage and ambient temperature, you can expect a full charge in approximately 2-3 hours. This is significantly faster than the Tecno Camon 16, which likely supports slower charging speeds.