The Oppo A55s and Tecno Camon 16 represent two approaches to the budget smartphone market. The A55s leverages the more modern and efficient Mediatek Dimensity 700, offering 5G connectivity, while the Camon 16 relies on the established Helio G70. This comparison dissects their core differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo A55s is the superior choice. Its Dimensity 700 chipset delivers noticeably better performance and future-proofs with 5G support. While the Tecno Camon 16 remains a viable option for basic tasks, the A55s provides a smoother, more responsive experience for a relatively small price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 10. Released 2020, October 16 | 2022, April 18 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, April 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 170.9 x 77.2 x 9.2 mm (6.73 x 3.04 x 0.36 in) | 163.9 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 207 g (7.30 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~263 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 480 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CB Helio G70 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 10, HIOS 6.0 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Penta-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), AF | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cloud White, Purist Blue, Misty Grey | Black, Blue, Gold |
| Models | CE7, CE7j, CE9h, MZ-TECNO CE7j | CPH2309 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| SAR | 0.95 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) | - |
Tecno Camon 16
- More powerful Dimensity 700 chipset
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Potentially better image processing
- Slower 10W charging
- Potentially higher price point
Oppo A55s
- Lower price point
- Potentially comparable battery life
- Established Helio G70 platform
- Less powerful Helio G70 chipset
- No 5G connectivity
- Less efficient 12nm process
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the A55s's positioning, it likely features a higher-resolution panel than the Camon 16. The A55s's more modern chipset suggests potential for higher refresh rates, though this isn't confirmed. The Camon 16, being older, likely utilizes a standard 60Hz panel. Color accuracy and peak brightness will likely be comparable, leaning towards the A55s having a slight edge due to its newer design.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the A55s’s more modern ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Dimensity 700 chipset likely provides superior image processing capabilities. This could result in better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. Both phones likely feature a primary camera, but the A55s’s chipset allows for more advanced features like better HDR processing. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A55s’s Mediatek Dimensity 700, built on a 7nm process, offers a significant advantage over the Tecno Camon 16’s Mediatek Helio G70 (12nm). The Dimensity 700’s Cortex-A76 cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, outperform the G70’s Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz in both single-core and multi-core tasks. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The 7nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The A55s also benefits from integrated 5G modem, a feature absent in the Camon 16.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for either device. However, the Oppo A55s’s 10W charging is significantly slower than what is commonly found in modern smartphones. The Helio G70 in the Camon 16, being less power-hungry, might offer comparable battery life despite potentially having a smaller capacity. The A55s’s more efficient Dimensity 700 could offset the slower charging to some extent, but users will likely experience longer charge times.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 16 if you prioritize a lower upfront cost and primarily use your phone for basic communication, social media, and light web browsing. Buy the Oppo A55s if you value smoother multitasking, occasional gaming, and the benefits of 5G connectivity, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oppo A55s overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Mediatek Dimensity 700's 7nm process is more thermally efficient than the Helio G70's 12nm process. While it won't match flagship-level cooling, the A55s is less likely to experience significant throttling during extended gaming compared to the Camon 16.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Oppo A55s actually useful if 5G coverage is limited in my area?
Even with limited 5G coverage, the A55s benefits from the Dimensity 700's improved 4G LTE performance. Furthermore, investing in a 5G-capable device future-proofs you as 5G networks expand, offering faster speeds when available.
❓ Does the Tecno Camon 16 have enough processing power for everyday tasks like social media and web browsing?
Yes, the Helio G70 is sufficient for basic tasks like social media, web browsing, and messaging. However, you may experience slowdowns when multitasking or running demanding applications.
