The Tecno Camon 16 Premier and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Camon 16 Premier, with its focus on camera capabilities, aims to deliver a strong multimedia experience. Conversely, the Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) prioritizes raw processing power with the Dimensity 1100 chipset, positioning itself as a more capable all-rounder.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 1100 chipset offers a significant leap in processing power and efficiency over the Camon 16 Premier’s Helio G90T. However, the Camon 16 Premier remains a viable option for those heavily focused on camera features and a slightly longer endurance rating.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - India | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 04. Released 2020, September 04 | 2021, May 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, June 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 170.6 x 77.2 x 9.1 mm (6.72 x 3.04 x 0.36 in) | 163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.85 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10+, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785 Helio G90T (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 10, HIOS 6.0 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Penta-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (dedicated video camera)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm
8 MP, f/2.2, 105˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 70% in 30 min (International)
18W wired (India) | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glacial Silver | Stargaze Black, Wave Blue, Cloud White |
| Models | CE9, CD6j | - |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | 1.25 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 118h | - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1896:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-28.1 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 283847 (v8)
GeekBench: 6692 (v4.4), 1672 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Tecno Camon 16 Premier
- Potentially longer battery endurance (118h rating)
- Focus on camera features (marketing emphasis)
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Older Helio G90T chipset
- Slower charging speeds (especially in India)
- Less powerful CPU and GPU
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China)
- Significantly faster Dimensity 1100 chipset
- Ultra-fast 67W charging (full charge in 42 mins)
- Likely superior display quality (higher refresh rate)
- Better thermal management
- Potentially shorter battery life (depending on capacity)
- May be more expensive than the Camon 16 Premier
- Limited information on camera sensor size
Display Comparison
Both devices lack detailed display specifications beyond basic measurements. The Tecno Camon 16 Premier boasts a measured peak brightness of 400 nits and a 1896:1 contrast ratio. While adequate, this is likely surpassed by the Redmi Note 10 Pro, given Xiaomi’s typical display quality in this segment. The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s display, though not specified here, likely benefits from a higher refresh rate (common in the Note 10 series) which the Camon 16 Premier lacks, resulting in smoother scrolling and animations. The absence of detailed color accuracy data makes a definitive judgment impossible, but Xiaomi generally calibrates its displays for more vibrant colors.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are marketed with a focus on photography, but the available data is limited. The Tecno Camon 16 Premier’s camera capabilities are highlighted, but specific sensor details are missing. The Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) is also camera-focused, but again, lacks detailed specifications in this context. Given Xiaomi’s history, it’s reasonable to assume the Redmi Note 10 Pro features a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The absence of information on Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) prevents a direct comparison, but OIS is a common feature in Xiaomi’s Pro models, potentially giving it an edge in low-light photography and video stabilization. We can safely ignore the presence of 2MP macro lenses on either device, as their image quality is typically negligible.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6nm), featuring a more modern architecture with 4x Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz, compared to the Tecno Camon 16 Premier’s Helio G90T (12nm) with 2x Cortex-A76 cores at 2.05 GHz. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 1100 translates to significantly improved power efficiency and thermal management, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. This means the Redmi Note 10 Pro will maintain higher performance levels for longer periods, particularly in gaming. The architectural advantage of the A78 cores also provides a noticeable boost in single-core performance, impacting app launch times and overall responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Tecno Camon 16 Premier claims an endurance rating of 118 hours, suggesting good battery life. However, the Redmi Note 10 Pro compensates for any potential capacity difference with its significantly faster 67W charging, achieving a full charge in just 42 minutes. The Camon 16 Premier offers 33W charging (International) or 18W (India), taking considerably longer to reach 100%. This charging speed disparity is a major advantage for the Redmi Note 10 Pro, minimizing downtime and offering greater convenience. While the Camon 16 Premier may offer slightly longer runtime on a single charge, the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s rapid charging mitigates this difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 16 Premier if you need a phone primarily for photography and videography, and value a slightly longer battery life between charges. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications, and prioritize faster charging speeds.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 1100 in the Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1100's 6nm process node and efficient thermal design significantly mitigate overheating. While some warmth is expected during intensive gaming, it's unlikely to experience significant throttling like the Helio G90T in the Camon 16 Premier, which is more prone to heat-related performance drops.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Tecno Camon 16 Premier fast enough for daily use?
While 33W charging is respectable, it's considerably slower than the Redmi Note 10 Pro's 67W charging. Expect a full charge to take well over an hour, potentially impacting convenience for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
❓ How does the Helio G90T handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Helio G90T can run PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The Dimensity 1100 in the Redmi Note 10 Pro will provide a smoother, more consistent gaming experience at higher settings.
❓ What kind of camera features can I expect from the Tecno Camon 16 Premier?
Tecno heavily markets the Camon 16 Premier's camera, but specific details are lacking. Expect features like night mode, portrait mode, and potentially AI scene detection. However, without knowing the sensor size and image processing capabilities, it's difficult to assess its overall image quality compared to the Redmi Note 10 Pro.
