Tecno Camon 16 Premier vs Oppo Reno 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and 5G connectivity, the Oppo Reno 5G is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 855, built on a 7nm process, offers a significant architectural advantage over the Camon 16 Premier’s 12nm Helio G90T. However, the Camon 16 Premier’s faster 33W charging (internationally) and impressive endurance rating make it compelling for users who value battery life above all else.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Tecno Camon 16 Premier | Oppo Reno 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 78 NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - India | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 04. Released 2020, September 04 | 2019, April. Released 2019, May |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 170.6 x 77.2 x 9.1 mm (6.72 x 3.04 x 0.36 in) | 162 x 77.2 x 9.3 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.85 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10+, 480 nits (typ) | AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785 Helio G90T (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 10, HIOS 6.0 | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Penta-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (dedicated video camera) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 130mm (periscope telephoto), 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 105˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | - | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 70% in 30 min (International) 18W wired (India) | 20W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4065 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Glacial Silver | Ocean Green, Jet Black |
| Models | CE9, CD6j | CPH1921 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 880 EUR |
| SAR | 1.25 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 118h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1896:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -28.1 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 283847 (v8) GeekBench: 6692 (v4.4), 1672 (v5.1) GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Tecno Camon 16 Premier
- Faster 33W charging (International version)
- Impressive 118-hour endurance rating
- Potentially lower price point
- Less powerful Helio G90T chipset
- 12nm process may lead to throttling
- Limited display information
Oppo Reno 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 855 chipset
- 7nm process for better efficiency
- 5G connectivity
- Slower 20W charging
- Battery life potentially lower than Camon 16 Premier
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Both phones lack detailed display specifications beyond the Camon 16 Premier’s measured 400 nits of brightness and 1896:1 contrast ratio. While the Reno 5G’s display specs are unavailable, Oppo generally employs high-quality AMOLED panels. The Camon 16 Premier’s contrast ratio suggests a VA panel, which delivers deep blacks but may suffer from narrower viewing angles compared to the IPS panels often found in this price bracket. The 400 nits brightness is adequate for indoor use but may struggle in direct sunlight. Without further data, it’s difficult to assess color accuracy on either device.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised with a focus on photography, but detailed sensor information is lacking. The absence of specifics necessitates caution. The Reno 5G’s camera system likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 855, offering advanced image processing capabilities. The Camon 16 Premier’s camera is listed as supporting both photo and video, but without details on sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS), it’s impossible to assess its capabilities accurately. We can assume both phones will feature multiple lenses, but the quality of those lenses will be crucial.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno 5G’s Snapdragon 855, fabricated on a 7nm process, boasts a more efficient architecture than the Tecno Camon 16 Premier’s 12nm Helio G90T. The Snapdragon 855’s Kryo 485 cores, with their varying clock speeds (2.84 GHz, 2.42 GHz, and 1.78 GHz), offer a more sophisticated performance profile than the Helio G90T’s octa-core configuration (2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). This translates to better sustained performance under load, meaning less throttling during extended gaming sessions. While the G90T is capable, the Snapdragon 855 provides a clear advantage in raw processing power and graphical capabilities.
Battery Life
The Tecno Camon 16 Premier claims an impressive endurance rating of 118 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. This is coupled with 33W wired charging (international variant) capable of reaching 70% charge in 30 minutes, a significant advantage over the Reno 5G’s 20W charging. However, the Indian variant of the Camon 16 Premier is limited to 18W charging, diminishing this benefit. The Reno 5G’s battery capacity is unknown, but the Snapdragon 855’s 7nm process *should* offer better power efficiency, potentially offsetting the slower charging speed. The Camon 16 Premier’s endurance rating suggests a larger battery capacity, prioritizing longevity over quick top-ups (in the international version).
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 16 Premier if you need a phone that can last a full day on a single charge and benefits from extremely fast charging (especially the international version). It’s ideal for users who prioritize battery endurance and don’t heavily rely on demanding mobile games. Buy the Oppo Reno 5G if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for gaming and everyday tasks, and require 5G connectivity. It’s the better option for power users and those who want a phone that feels more future-proof.