Tecno Mobile has become a significant player in the budget smartphone market, offering compelling features at aggressive price points. The Camon 15 and Spark 5 Pro represent two popular choices within their lineup, but cater to slightly different priorities. This comparison dives deep into their specifications to determine which device delivers the best overall experience for the price-conscious consumer.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Tecno Spark 5 Pro emerges as the slightly better value. While both phones utilize a Mediatek Helio chipset, the Spark 5 Pro’s Helio A25, with its dual-core configuration at a higher clock speed, provides a noticeable performance edge in multitasking and light gaming, justifying its position as the preferred choice.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, February 21. Released 2020, February 25 | 2020, July 13. Released 2020, July 13 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 164.7 x 76.3 x 8.8 mm (6.48 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6762D Helio A25 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 10, HIOS 6.0 | Android 10, HIOS 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, PDAF
2 MP
2 MP
Auxiliary lens | 16 MP, f/1.8, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lenses |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Shoal Gold, Fascinating Purple, Jade | Ice Jadeite, Spark Orange, Seabed Blue, Cloud White |
| Models | CD7 | - |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 120 EUR |
| SAR | 0.80 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) | - |
Tecno Camon 15
- Potentially more refined software experience (depending on Tecno’s customization)
- Slightly simpler processor architecture may lead to fewer software conflicts
- Established chipset with known performance characteristics
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Spark 5 Pro
- May struggle with multitasking and demanding apps
- Likely to exhibit more lag during intensive tasks
Tecno Spark 5 pro
- More powerful chipset with big.LITTLE architecture
- Better multitasking capabilities
- Slightly improved gaming performance
- Helio A25 may have more software bugs due to newer implementation
- Potentially slightly lower battery life under heavy load
- May not be as widely reviewed as the Camon 15
Display Comparison
Neither Tecno explicitly details display specifications beyond size. However, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The focus here is on internal processing power, not display fidelity. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, reflecting their budget positioning. Color accuracy is unlikely to be a strong point on either, and neither is expected to feature high brightness levels for outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are likely to feature a multi-camera setup, but detailed sensor information is limited. The marketing often emphasizes megapixel count over sensor size and quality. It’s safe to assume both will include a primary camera, a depth sensor, and potentially a macro lens. However, the image processing capabilities will be heavily reliant on the chipset. The Spark 5 Pro’s slightly more powerful processor *could* translate to faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance, but this is not guaranteed. Focusing on the primary sensor’s megapixel count is misleading; sensor size and aperture are more critical for image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Camon 15 features the Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22, an octa-core processor clocked at 2.0 GHz, utilizing eight Cortex-A53 cores. The Spark 5 Pro, however, employs the MT6762D Helio A25. While also octa-core, the A25 uses a big.LITTLE architecture with four cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and four at 1.5 GHz. This configuration, despite the lower overall clock speed, often translates to better responsiveness in everyday tasks due to the more powerful cores handling foreground processes. The A25’s architecture provides a slight advantage in handling multiple apps simultaneously, making the Spark 5 Pro more suitable for multitasking. Both phones likely feature similar RAM configurations, but the chipset difference will be the primary determinant of performance.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified in the provided data. However, Tecno typically equips its budget phones with large batteries (4000mAh or greater) to compensate for the less efficient chipsets. Charging wattage is also unknown. Real-world battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns, but the Spark 5 Pro’s slightly more efficient chipset *could* result in marginally longer battery life, especially during moderate use. Without specific charging wattage details, it’s difficult to assess 0-100% charging times.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 15 if you prioritize a potentially more refined software experience and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and social media. Buy the Tecno Spark 5 Pro if you need a phone capable of handling moderate multitasking, enjoy occasional gaming, and want a bit more processing power for the price. The Spark 5 Pro is the better option for users who want a more responsive device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Tecno Spark 5 Pro handle popular games like PUBG Mobile?
The Helio A25 in the Spark 5 Pro is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but likely at lower graphics settings (Low or Medium) to maintain a playable frame rate. Expect some occasional stuttering, especially during intense firefights. The Camon 15 will likely struggle even more with this title.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the Helio P22 and Helio A25 noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the difference is noticeable, particularly when multitasking. The Spark 5 Pro’s Helio A25, with its big.LITTLE architecture, handles switching between apps and running multiple apps simultaneously more smoothly than the Camon 15’s Helio P22. This translates to a more responsive user experience.
❓ Which phone is better for taking photos in low light?
While neither phone excels in low-light photography, the Spark 5 Pro *may* have a slight edge due to its potentially faster image processing capabilities. However, the quality will still be limited by the sensor size and aperture, which are unknown.
❓ Does either phone support fast charging?
The provided specifications do not mention fast charging support for either device. It’s likely both phones support standard 5W or 10W charging, resulting in relatively slow charging times.
