The Tecno Camon 15 Premier and Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW represent different approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Camon 15 Premier, while older, aimed to deliver features at a competitive price. The A51 5G UW, leveraging Samsung’s brand recognition, brought 5G connectivity to a wider audience. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device offers the best experience in 2024.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 765G chipset offers a significant performance leap over the Tecno Camon 15 Premier’s Helio P35, enabling smoother multitasking and a more responsive user experience, despite the slower 15W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28 | 2, 4, 5, 13, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 260, 261 mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 13. Released 2020, April 13 | 2020, August 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, August 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 77.7 x 9.1 mm (6.43 x 3.06 x 0.36 in) | 158.8 x 73.4 x 8.6 mm (6.25 x 2.89 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM (pre-installed) |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 188.8 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765V/W Helio P35 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, HIOS 6.0 | Android 10, One UI 2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 14mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lenses | 48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 5 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 32 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | ANT+ |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 15W wired |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 672 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 5 h |
| Type | 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ice Jadeite, Opal White | Prism Bricks Blue |
| Models | CD8j | SM-A516V |
| Price | - | About 470 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.70 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.32 W/kg (body) |
Tecno Camon 15 Premier
- Potentially lower price point
- May offer unique software features specific to Tecno
- Could have a larger battery capacity (spec not provided)
- Significantly weaker performance due to Helio P35 chipset
- Less efficient chipset leading to shorter battery life
- Likely inferior camera performance
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 765G
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- More efficient chipset for better battery life
- Slower 15W charging
- Higher price compared to the Tecno Camon 15 Premier
- LCD display lacks the vibrancy of OLED panels
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. The Tecno Camon 15 Premier’s display specifications are not provided, but given its market positioning, it likely features a standard LCD panel. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW also utilizes an LCD, but Samsung’s display expertise likely results in better color accuracy and viewing angles. The absence of high refresh rates on both devices suggests a focus on battery life over visual fluidity. Bezels are expected to be noticeable on both, typical for this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is difficult to assess without detailed image samples, but the hardware suggests the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW has an advantage. While both likely feature multi-camera setups, the Snapdragon 765G’s image signal processor (ISP) offers superior image processing capabilities. The Tecno Camon 15 Premier’s camera specs are not detailed enough to make a definitive judgement, but the A51 5G UW’s ISP will likely deliver better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality. The prevalence of low-resolution auxiliary cameras (often 2MP) in this segment means focusing on the main sensor’s capabilities is crucial.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, built on a 7nm process, is significantly more efficient and powerful than the Tecno Camon 15 Premier’s Mediatek Helio P35 (12nm). The Snapdragon 765G’s Kryo CPU architecture – with its Prime, Gold, and Silver cores – allows for intelligent task allocation, resulting in faster app launches and smoother multitasking. The Helio P35’s Cortex-A53 cores, while adequate for basic tasks, will struggle with demanding applications and games. The 7nm node of the Snapdragon also translates to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended use.
Battery Life
Battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW’s 15W charging is comparatively slow, meaning a full charge will take a considerable amount of time. The Tecno Camon 15 Premier’s battery capacity is unknown, but the less efficient Helio P35 chipset will likely result in shorter battery life under similar usage conditions. The Snapdragon 765G’s efficiency partially offsets the slower charging, potentially providing comparable real-world battery endurance despite a potentially smaller battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 15 Premier if you need a very budget-friendly device and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW if you prioritize 5G connectivity, smoother performance for gaming and multitasking, and a more refined software experience, even if it means accepting slower charging speeds.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Tecno Camon 15 Premier struggle with modern mobile games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
Yes, the Mediatek Helio P35 chipset is not designed for demanding games. While you might be able to run them at the lowest settings, expect significant frame rate drops and a generally poor gaming experience. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW’s Snapdragon 765G will provide a much smoother and more enjoyable gaming experience.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW's 15W charging feel noticeably slow in 2024?
Yes, 15W charging is relatively slow by today's standards. Expect a full charge to take well over two hours. While the Snapdragon 765G’s efficiency helps mitigate this, users accustomed to fast charging will find it inconvenient. The Tecno Camon 15 Premier’s charging speed is unknown, but it’s unlikely to be significantly faster.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW actually useful?
The usefulness of 5G depends on your location and carrier coverage. If you live in an area with robust 5G infrastructure, you'll experience significantly faster download and upload speeds. However, if 5G coverage is limited, you'll primarily connect to 4G LTE, diminishing the benefit.
