The Tecno Camon 15 Premier and Nokia 7.2 represent compelling options in the budget smartphone space, but cater to slightly different priorities. The Camon 15 Premier aims for a balance of features, while the Nokia 7.2 emphasizes a clean software experience and solid build quality. This comparison dives deep into their specifications to determine which device delivers the most value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a potentially smoother experience, the Nokia 7.2 emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 660 chipset, despite being built on a larger process node, offers a more refined architecture than the Helio P35, translating to better multitasking and app responsiveness.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - ROW |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - ROW |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps or LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - IN |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 13. Released 2020, April 13 | 2019, September 05. Released 2019, September 23 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 77.7 x 9.1 mm (6.43 x 3.06 x 0.36 in) | 159.9 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765V/W Helio P35 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 10, HIOS 6.0 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, Android One |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Zeiss optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 14mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Zeiss optics, HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 32 MP | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes (excl. India) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | 4000 mAh | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ice Jadeite, Opal White | Cyan Green, Charcoal, Ice |
| Models | CD8j | TA-1193, TA-1178, TA-1196, TA-1181 |
| Price | - | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.15 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.44 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.0dB / Crosstalk -93.4dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 69h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1342:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 139495 (v7), 164484 (v8)
GeekBench: 5440 (v4.4), 1398 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Camon 15 Premier
- Potentially lower price point
- May offer faster charging (unconfirmed)
- Feature-rich for the price
- Less powerful processor
- Potentially lower image quality
- Uncertain software support
Nokia 7.2
- More powerful and efficient processor
- Cleaner Android experience
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Slower 10W charging
- Potentially higher price
- Build quality may not be as premium as some competitors
Display Comparison
Both devices feature similar contrast ratios at 1342:1, suggesting comparable image depth. However, the Nokia 7.2 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 585 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Camon 15 Premier. This higher peak brightness on the Nokia 7.2 will translate to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, the Nokia’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the Tecno Camon 15 Premier. The Nokia 7.2 likely features a more refined camera system, benefiting from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 660. Without specific sensor details for the Camon 15 Premier, it’s difficult to assess its image quality, but the Nokia 7.2’s ISP provides a strong foundation for consistent and detailed photos and videos. We can assume the Nokia 7.2 will have better image processing capabilities.
Performance
The Nokia 7.2’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm) utilizes Kryo 260 cores, offering a more efficient and powerful architecture than the Mediatek Helio P35 (12nm) found in the Tecno Camon 15 Premier. While the Helio P35 has eight Cortex-A53 cores, the Snapdragon 660’s Kryo 260 Gold cores provide a noticeable performance uplift in single-core tasks and overall responsiveness. The Snapdragon 660’s Adreno 512 GPU also surpasses the Helio P35’s PowerVR GE8320 in graphical performance, making the Nokia 7.2 the better choice for light gaming and demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both the Tecno Camon 15 Premier and Nokia 7.2 share an endurance rating of 69 hours, suggesting similar battery life under typical usage. However, the Nokia 7.2 is limited to 10W wired charging, which is significantly slower than what is becoming standard. The Camon 15 Premier’s charging speed is unspecified, but a faster charging solution would be a significant advantage. The similar endurance ratings suggest comparable battery capacity, but the Nokia 7.2’s slower charging could be a drawback for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 15 Premier if you need a phone with a focus on maximizing features for the price, and are willing to accept potential performance limitations in demanding tasks. Buy the Nokia 7.2 if you prefer a more polished user experience, a cleaner Android implementation, and a chipset known for its stability and efficiency, even if it means sacrificing some raw processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 660 in the Nokia 7.2 still capable of handling modern apps and multitasking?
Yes, the Snapdragon 660 remains a capable chipset for everyday tasks and moderate multitasking. While not a flagship processor, its Kryo 260 cores and 6GB of RAM (typically found in the Nokia 7.2) provide a smooth experience for most users, handling social media, web browsing, and common apps without significant lag.
❓ How does the Mediatek Helio P35 in the Tecno Camon 15 Premier perform with mobile gaming?
The Helio P35 is a budget-oriented chipset and will struggle with demanding games at high settings. While it can run less intensive titles, expect lower frame rates and potential stuttering in popular games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile. The Nokia 7.2’s Snapdragon 660 offers a noticeably better gaming experience.
❓ What kind of software experience can I expect from the Nokia 7.2?
The Nokia 7.2 is part of the Android One program, meaning it runs a clean, stock version of Android with guaranteed software updates and security patches for a specified period. This provides a bloatware-free experience and ensures your phone stays secure and up-to-date.
❓ Does the Nokia 7.2 support fast charging, and how long does it take to fully charge?
Unfortunately, the Nokia 7.2 only supports 10W wired charging, which is relatively slow compared to modern smartphones. A full charge from 0% to 100% will likely take around 2.5 to 3 hours. This is a significant drawback for users who prioritize quick charging.
