Both the Tecno Camon 15 Air and Motorola Moto E7 Power occupy the ultra-budget smartphone segment, targeting first-time smartphone buyers or those seeking a reliable secondary device. While both devices share a similar price point, they diverge in their internal hardware, particularly in their chipsets, impacting performance and user experience. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which phone offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a slightly more efficient chipset, the Motorola Moto E7 Power is the better choice. Its Helio G25, with its mixed Cortex-A53 configuration, provides a noticeable advantage in multitasking and light gaming compared to the Camon 15 Air’s Helio P22.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 13. Released 2020, April 13 | 2021, February 19 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, February 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 76.5 x 9 mm (6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 165.1 x 75.9 x 9.2 mm (6.5 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.51 inches, 103.1 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 380 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 10, HIOS 6.0 | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMCP |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro) |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Stand-by | Up to 384 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 17 h (3G) | - |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Malachite Blue, Ice lake Blue, Misty Gray | Tahiti Blue, Coral Red |
| Models | CD6, CD6S | PAMH0001IN, PAMH0010IN, PAMH0019IN |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 140 EUR |
Tecno Camon 15 Air
- Potentially brighter display (speculative)
- May offer a more aesthetically pleasing design (subjective)
- Tecno's HiOS software may appeal to some users
- Less efficient Helio P22 chipset
- Likely lower sustained performance
- Potentially shorter battery life
Motorola Moto E7 Power
- More efficient Helio G25 chipset
- Improved multitasking and light gaming performance
- Potentially longer battery life
- 10W charging is relatively slow
- Motorola's software is more basic
- May have a less vibrant display
Display Comparison
Neither Tecno nor Motorola provide detailed display specifications for these models. However, given their price point, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The absence of information regarding brightness (nits), color gamut coverage, or resolution makes a direct comparison difficult. We can infer that both displays are optimized for power efficiency rather than color accuracy or peak brightness. The Camon 15 Air *may* have a slight edge if it utilizes a higher peak brightness panel, but this is speculative.
Camera Comparison
Both phones likely feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. Without specific sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS). Image processing will likely be heavily reliant on software algorithms to enhance image quality, and differences in these algorithms will likely be more noticeable than any hardware advantages.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Tecno Camon 15 Air features the Mediatek Helio P22 (MT6762), an octa-core processor comprised entirely of Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. The Motorola Moto E7 Power, however, utilizes the Helio G25 (MT6762G). While also an octa-core processor, the G25 employs a heterogeneous architecture: four Cortex-A53 cores at 2.0 GHz paired with four Cortex-A53 cores at 1.5 GHz. This 'big.LITTLE' approach allows the G25 to dynamically allocate tasks to the appropriate cores, improving power efficiency during light workloads and boosting performance when needed. This architecture gives the Moto E7 Power a clear advantage in sustained performance and multitasking, despite the lower clock speed on some cores.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto E7 Power includes 10W wired charging, a standard offering in this price bracket. While the exact battery capacity of both devices isn't specified, the 'Power' branding of the Moto E7 suggests a larger battery capacity than the Camon 15 Air. The Helio G25’s more efficient architecture in the Moto E7 Power will also contribute to longer battery life, even with a similar capacity. The 10W charging will result in relatively slow charging times for both devices, likely taking several hours to reach a full charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 15 Air if you prioritize a potentially brighter display (though specifics are unknown) and are primarily focused on basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the Motorola Moto E7 Power if you prefer a phone capable of handling slightly more demanding tasks, such as extended browsing sessions or casual gaming, and value the benefit of a more efficient processor architecture for longer-lasting performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Motorola Moto E7 Power struggle with popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
No, the Helio G25 chipset is perfectly capable of handling everyday apps like WhatsApp and Facebook. The mixed-core architecture ensures smooth performance even with multiple apps open, providing a more responsive experience than the Camon 15 Air's Helio P22.
❓ Is the 10W charging on the Moto E7 Power slow compared to other phones?
Yes, 10W charging is relatively slow by today's standards. Expect a full charge to take around 3-4 hours. However, given the likely battery capacity and the chipset's efficiency, the Moto E7 Power is designed to prioritize battery life over fast charging speeds.
❓ Can I play games like PUBG Mobile on the Tecno Camon 15 Air or Motorola Moto E7 Power?
While both phones *can* run PUBG Mobile, the experience will be limited to the lowest graphics settings and frame rates. The Moto E7 Power's Helio G25 will provide a slightly smoother experience, but neither phone is designed for serious gaming.
❓ Which phone is better for taking quick photos of documents?
Both phones will suffice for basic document scanning, but the image quality will be limited. Ensure good lighting conditions for optimal results. Neither phone offers features like automatic document edge detection.
