The Tecno Camon 12 represents an older generation of affordable smartphones, while the Motorola Moto G86 Power aims to deliver modern features and extended battery life at a competitive price. This comparison dissects the core differences between these two devices, focusing on performance, battery endurance, and overall value for the budget-conscious consumer.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and a smoother experience, the Motorola Moto G86 Power is the clear winner. Its significantly more powerful Dimensity 7300/7400 chipset and 30W charging outweigh the Camon 12's lower price point, offering a far more future-proof and enjoyable user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 71 - EMEA & AP |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - EMEA & AP |
| EDGE | Yes | - |
| GPRS | Yes | - |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, August. Released 2019, August | 2025, May 29 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2025, July 30 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back |
| Dimensions | 166 x 75.8 x 8.2 mm (6.54 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) | 161.2 x 74.7 x 8.7 mm (6.35 x 2.94 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 170.7 g (6.03 oz) | 195 or 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 4 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 4500 nits peak |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - GlobalOcta-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - India |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) - GlobalMediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm) - India |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), HIOS 5.5 | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 12mm, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | - |
| Triple | 16 MP, PDAF
8 MP
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 30W wired |
| Talk time | Up to 7 h (multimedia) | - |
| Type | 4000 mAh, non-removable | 6720 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dawn Blue, Dark Jade, Sky Cyan | Pantone: Spellbound, Golden Cypress, Cosmic Sky, Chrysanthemum |
| Models | CC7S | XT2527-7 |
| Price | About 460 EUR | $ 472.00 / € 269.90 / ₹ 17,000 |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | - | 67:39h endurance, 1000 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class A |
| Free fall | - | Class B (180 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class B |
Tecno Camon 12
- Potentially lower price point
- Functional for basic tasks
- May have a dedicated microSD card slot (market dependent)
- Outdated chipset
- Poor performance for demanding apps
- Likely shorter battery life
- Inferior camera quality
Motorola Moto G86 Power
- Significantly faster processor
- Long battery life (67:39h endurance)
- 30W fast charging
- More future-proof
- Better camera performance (likely)
- Higher price point
- May lack a headphone jack (market dependent)
- Software update support may be limited
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided for the Tecno Camon 12, making a direct comparison difficult. However, given its market segment, it likely features a 720p LCD panel. The Moto G86 Power, while not specified, benefits from a more modern manufacturing process and likely a higher resolution display. The key differentiator here is the chipset's ability to drive a higher refresh rate display, a feature likely absent on the Camon 12. The G86 Power's display technology will likely offer better color accuracy and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Camera details for the Tecno Camon 12 are limited. The Moto G86 Power's camera system is not detailed in the provided data, but given Motorola's recent offerings, it likely features a more sophisticated image processing pipeline and potentially a larger main sensor. The Helio P22's image signal processor (ISP) is less capable than the Dimensity 7300/7400's, resulting in lower image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The G86 Power will likely offer better dynamic range and detail in photos and videos.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Tecno Camon 12's MediaTek Helio P22, built on a 12nm process with Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz, is a budget-oriented chipset designed for basic tasks. In contrast, the Motorola Moto G86 Power utilizes the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (Global) or 7400 (India), fabricated on a 4nm process. The Dimensity chips feature a combination of Cortex-A78 and A55 cores, with the A78 cores reaching up to 2.6 GHz. This architectural leap translates to significantly faster CPU and GPU performance, enabling smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more enjoyable gaming experience. The 4nm process also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G86 Power boasts an impressive 67:39h endurance rating and supports 30W wired charging. While the Camon 12's battery capacity is unknown, its less efficient chipset will likely result in significantly shorter battery life. The 30W charging on the G86 Power allows for a much faster 0-100% charge time compared to what would be expected on the Camon 12. The G86 Power's battery is also rated for 1000 cycles, suggesting long-term reliability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 12 if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. Buy the Motorola Moto G86 Power if you prioritize a responsive user interface, longer battery life, faster charging, and the ability to handle more demanding applications and occasional gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Motorola Moto G86 Power handle demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile smoothly?
The Dimensity 7300/7400 chipset in the Moto G86 Power is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile at medium to high settings with playable frame rates. While it's not a flagship gaming phone, it offers a significantly better gaming experience than the Helio P22-powered Camon 12, which would struggle with these titles.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the Motorola Moto G86 Power compared to what I might expect on the Tecno Camon 12?
The Moto G86 Power's 30W charging will drastically reduce charging times. While the Camon 12 likely supports a much slower charging rate (likely 10W or less), the G86 Power can replenish a significant portion of its battery in a short amount of time, minimizing downtime.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance between the Helio P22 and Dimensity 7300/7400 noticeable in everyday tasks?
Absolutely. The Dimensity 7300/7400 offers a substantial performance uplift in everyday tasks like app launching, web browsing, and multitasking. You'll experience smoother animations, faster response times, and an overall more fluid user experience with the Moto G86 Power.
