The Tecno Camon 12 Pro and Xiaomi Poco X3 GT represent different approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Camon 12 Pro, while older, aims for affordability, while the Poco X3 GT prioritizes performance with a more powerful chipset and faster charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 1100 chipset offers a substantial performance leap over the Tecno Camon 12 Pro’s Helio P22, making it ideal for gaming and demanding applications. The 67W fast charging is a game-changer, offsetting the similar battery endurance ratings.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, September. Released 2019, September | 2021, July 28 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, August 19 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 75.5 x 7.8 mm (6.24 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 161 g (5.68 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~276 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.35 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~81.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), HIOS 5.5 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 16 MP, PDAF
8 MP
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, 960fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 3500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dawn Blue | Stargaze Black, Wave Blue, Cloud White |
| Models | - | 21061110AG |
| Price | About 10000 INR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.58 W/kg (head) 0.94 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 110h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1425:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.5 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506800 (v8) | 578505 (v9)
GeekBench: 2310 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Camon 12 Pro
- Lower price point
- Acceptable battery endurance
- Functional for basic tasks
- Outdated Helio P22 chipset
- Slow charging speeds (assumed)
- Likely inferior camera performance
Xiaomi Poco X3 GT
- Powerful Dimensity 1100 chipset
- 67W fast charging (42 min 0-100%)
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Better thermal management
- Higher price than Tecno Camon 12 Pro
- May be overkill for basic users
- Potentially larger size/weight
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a contrast ratio of 1425:1, suggesting similar visual depth. However, the Poco X3 GT boasts a measured peak brightness of 537 nits, significantly brighter than what we'd expect from the Camon 12 Pro, making it more usable outdoors. While panel technology isn't specified for the Camon 12 Pro, the X3 GT’s brightness advantage is a clear win for visibility in bright conditions.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the Camon 12 Pro. The Poco X3 GT likely features a more advanced camera system, benefiting from the processing power of the Dimensity 1100. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the X3 GT’s chipset provides a significant advantage in image processing and potentially video stabilization.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Tecno Camon 12 Pro’s Mediatek Helio P22 (12nm) and Cortex-A53 cores are designed for efficiency, not speed. In contrast, the Poco X3 GT’s Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6nm) utilizes more modern Cortex-A78 cores and a smaller fabrication process, resulting in substantially higher CPU and GPU performance. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app launches, and a far better gaming experience. The 6nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 110 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the Poco X3 GT’s 67W wired charging with PD3.0 support is a massive advantage, allowing a full charge in just 42 minutes. The Camon 12 Pro’s charging speed is likely significantly slower, making the X3 GT far more convenient for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 12 Pro if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT if you prioritize smooth gaming, faster app loading times, and significantly quicker charging, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Poco X3 GT's Dimensity 1100 chipset prone to overheating during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1100 is a relatively efficient chipset, and the Poco X3 GT incorporates thermal management features. While some heat generation is inevitable during prolonged gaming, it's unlikely to cause significant throttling or performance degradation compared to the Tecno Camon 12 Pro's Helio P22, which would struggle with even moderate gaming loads.
❓ How does the charging speed of the Poco X3 GT compare to typical mid-range phones?
The Poco X3 GT’s 67W charging is exceptionally fast for a mid-range phone. Most competitors in this price range offer 18W or 33W charging, meaning the X3 GT can charge from 0-100% in roughly half the time. This is a significant convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
❓ Will the Tecno Camon 12 Pro be sufficient for playing popular mobile games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Tecno Camon 12 Pro’s Helio P22 chipset is not ideal for demanding games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile. You may be able to run these games at the lowest settings, but expect significant frame rate drops and a generally poor gaming experience. The Poco X3 GT is far better suited for mobile gaming.
