TCL Tab 11 vs. Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ is the better choice. Its more modern 6nm Snapdragon 695 chipset delivers superior performance and efficiency compared to the TCL Tab 11’s 12nm Helio P60T, alongside the benefit of 5G connectivity. While the TCL Tab 11 is a capable device, the A9+ offers a more future-proof experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | TCL Tab 11 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 17, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - USA | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE - cellular model only | HSPA, LTE, 5G - cellular model only |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 26 | 2023, October 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May | Available. Released 2023, October 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 259 x 163.6 x 6.9 mm (10.20 x 6.44 x 0.27 in) | 257.1 x 168.7 x 6.9 mm (10.12 x 6.64 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM (cellular model only) | Nano-SIM + eSIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 462 g (1.02 lb) | 480 g or 492 g (1.06 lb) |
| Stylus support | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~213 ppi density) | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~206 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.95 inches, 341.3 cm2 (~80.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~80.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS | TFT LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8183 Helio P60T (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | - | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF | 8 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, 100˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Unspecified | - |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | Unspecified | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS - cellular model only |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 8000 mAh | Li-Po 7040 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Digital Lavender, Dark Gray | Graphite, Silver, Navy |
| Models | 9166G, 9466X | SM-X210, SM-X215, SM-X216B |
| Price | About 180 EUR | $ 199.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.42 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.19 W/kg (body) |
TCL Tab 11
- Potentially lower price point
- 18W wired charging
- Capable for basic tasks
- Older, less efficient chipset
- Likely lower sustained performance
- No 5G connectivity
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- 5G connectivity for on-the-go use
- Likely better sustained performance
- Slightly slower charging (15W)
- Potentially higher price
- Samsung's software bloat (subjective)
Display Comparison
Neither TCL nor Samsung provided display specs beyond resolution. However, the choice of chipsets hints at display capabilities. The Snapdragon 695 often pairs with higher refresh rate panels, suggesting the A9+ *may* offer a smoother visual experience. The older Helio P60T is likely paired with a standard 60Hz panel. The 6nm process of the Snapdragon allows for more power to be allocated to the display, potentially resulting in higher brightness and better color accuracy. Bezels are likely comparable given the price points, focusing on functional design rather than premium aesthetics.
Camera Comparison
Given the price bracket, camera performance isn't a primary focus. Both tablets likely feature modest camera setups. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive statement. However, Samsung’s image processing algorithms are generally more refined, potentially leading to slightly better image quality in good lighting conditions. Expect both to struggle in low-light scenarios. The presence of 5G in the A9+ *could* facilitate faster uploads of photos and videos, but this isn't directly related to camera hardware.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) boasts a more modern architecture with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. This contrasts with the TCL Tab 11’s MediaTek MT8183 Helio P60T (12nm) featuring 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x Cortex-A53 cores. The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon 695 is significantly more efficient, leading to less heat generation and sustained performance. While both are octa-core, the Snapdragon’s Kryo cores offer a performance advantage, particularly in multi-threaded tasks and gaming. The A9+ is likely to exhibit less throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified, but the Snapdragon 695’s superior efficiency gives the Galaxy Tab A9+ an advantage. The 6nm process consumes less power than the Helio P60T’s 12nm process. While the TCL Tab 11 has 18W wired charging, the A9+ has 15W. The efficiency gains of the Snapdragon may offset the slightly lower charging wattage, resulting in comparable or even faster real-world charging times. Users prioritizing all-day battery life will likely benefit from the A9+’s more efficient chipset.
Buying Guide
Buy the TCL Tab 11 if you prioritize a lower upfront cost and primarily need a tablet for basic tasks like web browsing, video streaming, and light productivity. It’s a solid option for casual users on a tight budget. Buy the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ if you value performance, 5G connectivity for on-the-go use, and a more efficient processor that will hold up better over time. This is the better choice for students, travelers, and anyone who wants a tablet that can handle more demanding applications.