TCL Stylus vs. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The TCL Stylus offers a significantly faster chipset and quicker charging, providing a smoother overall experience. However, the Moto G Stylus 5G boasts 5G connectivity and a potentially more refined software experience. For performance, TCL wins; for future-proofing, Motorola has an edge.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | TCL Stylus | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 25, 41, 66, 77 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 2, 5, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 02 | 2021, June 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 02 | Available. Released 2021, June 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 169.6 x 76.5 x 9 mm (6.68 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 169.5 x 77.5 x 9.4 mm (6.67 x 3.05 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 213 g (7.51 oz) | 217.5 g (7.69 oz) |
| Stylus | Stylus Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | NEG | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.81 inches, 110.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 500 nits (typ) | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, TCL UI 4.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0, 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.3, 19mm (ultrawide), 1/3", 1.12µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 5 MP, 115˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.3, 19mm (ultrawide), 1/3", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Lunar Black | Cosmic Emerald |
| Models | T779W | XT2131, XT2131DL, XT2131-1, XT2131-3, XT2131-4 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | € 189.97 / $ 74.98 / £ 179.95 |
| SAR | 1.25 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) | - |
TCL Stylus
- Faster Processor
- Quicker Charging (18W)
- Potentially More Vibrant Display
- Generally better performance
- Software updates may be less frequent
- Camera processing can be overly saturated
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G
- 5G Connectivity
- Motorola's Clean Software
- Potentially better outdoor visibility
- Generally more reliable software updates
- Slower Processor
- Slow Charging (10W)
- Lower overall performance
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large displays, typically around 6.8 inches, with Full HD+ resolution. The TCL Stylus often has slightly more vibrant colors, while the Moto G Stylus 5G might offer better outdoor visibility. Screen protectors are usually included with both.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are generally comparable, with both phones featuring a main sensor around 48MP. However, image processing differs. The TCL Stylus often produces more saturated images, while the Moto G Stylus 5G aims for a more natural look. Low-light performance is a weak point on both devices.
Performance
The TCL Stylus's Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Snapdragon 480 5G in the Moto G Stylus 5G. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the TCL Stylus. The Moto G Stylus 5G is adequate for everyday tasks but may struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones typically have large batteries (around 5000mAh), offering all-day battery life. However, the TCL Stylus charges significantly faster with its 18W wired charging, while the Moto G Stylus 5G is limited to 10W charging, which is considerably slower.
Buying Guide
The TCL Stylus is ideal for users prioritizing performance and a responsive stylus experience. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G is a better choice for those needing 5G connectivity and prefer Motorola's software, even if it means sacrificing some processing power.