TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7400 chipset delivers a substantial performance uplift over the Redmi Pad SE 8.7’s Helio G85. While the Redmi Pad SE offers value, the TCL’s endurance and faster charging make it a more compelling overall package.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra | Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 13, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE - cellular model only |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 04 | 2024, July 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 18 | Available. Released 2024, August 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Dimensions | 174.5 x 81.2 x 7.6 mm (6.87 x 3.20 x 0.30 in) | 211.6 x 125.5 x 8.8 mm (8.33 x 4.94 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 227 g (8.01 oz) | 370 / 373 / 375 g (13.05 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 7 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~358 ppi density) | 800 x 1340 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~179 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.2 inches, 127.3 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 8.7 inches, 214.9 cm2 (~80.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 850 (HBM) | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 90Hz, 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm) | Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.4, 71mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 28mm (wide), 1/3.1", 0.7µm | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS - cellular model only |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only), compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 50% in 30 min 10W reverse wired | 18W wired (Int'l) 10W wired (India) |
| Type | 5200 mAh | 6650 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Lunar White, Nebula Black | Aurora Green (Forest Green), Sky Blue (Ocean Blue), Graphite Gray (Urban Grey) |
| Models | T951K, T951P, T951P1 | 220233L2G |
| Price | £ 339.99 / € 397.84 | About 120 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.90 W/kg (head) 0.65 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.40 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 50:48h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra
- Significantly faster processor for demanding tasks
- More efficient 4nm chipset for longer battery life
- Faster 33W charging with 50% charge in 30 minutes
- 1000 charge cycle rating for extended battery health
- Likely higher price point
- NxtPaper display may not appeal to all users
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7
- More affordable price
- Sufficient for basic tasks like browsing and streaming
- Compact 8.7-inch size for portability
- 10W reverse charging
- Slower Helio G85 processor struggles with demanding apps
- Significantly slower 18W/10W charging
- Less efficient 12nm chipset impacts battery life
Display Comparison
While display specs are missing for the Redmi Pad SE 8.7 beyond its size, the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra’s focus is on eye comfort. The NxtPaper display technology aims to reduce blue light and mimic the texture of paper. The Redmi Pad SE 8.7 likely utilizes a standard IPS LCD, which, while functional, won’t offer the same eye-strain reduction. The TCL’s chipset also allows for potentially smoother scrolling and animations, assuming a higher refresh rate (not specified in the data).
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited for both devices. However, given the market segment, it’s safe to assume neither tablet prioritizes photography. The focus is likely on functional cameras for video calls and occasional snapshots. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. We can expect the TCL, being the higher-tier device, to potentially offer slightly better image processing, but this is speculative.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4nm) is a significant leap ahead of the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7’s Helio G85 (12nm). The Dimensity 7400 features a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A78 cores versus the A75 in the Helio G85 – and a smaller manufacturing node. This 4nm process translates to improved power efficiency and reduced heat generation, allowing for sustained performance. The Dimensity 7400’s octa-core configuration (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) provides a substantial advantage over the Helio G85’s (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55), particularly in multi-threaded workloads. This means faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better performance in demanding games.
Battery Life
The TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra boasts a 50:48h endurance rating, suggesting excellent battery life. Coupled with its 33W wired charging (50% in 30 minutes) and 10W reverse wired charging, it offers a convenient charging experience. The Redmi Pad SE 8.7’s 18W (International) or 10W (India) charging is significantly slower. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Dimensity 7400’s 4nm efficiency likely contributes to the TCL’s longer endurance despite potentially similar battery sizes. The 1000 charge cycles rating for the TCL also suggests a longer lifespan.
Buying Guide
Buy the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra if you need a tablet capable of handling demanding tasks like video editing, gaming, or multitasking without slowdowns, and if you value faster charging and longer battery life. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 if you prioritize affordability and primarily need a tablet for basic tasks like web browsing, streaming video, and light productivity – accepting a trade-off in processing power.