TCL A3 vs LG Stylo 5: A Deep Dive into Budget Smartphone Choices

The TCL A3 and LG Stylo 5 represent two compelling options in the ultra-budget smartphone space. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches to achieving this. This comparison dissects their core specifications to determine which device offers the best value for your money, focusing on performance, battery life, and display quality.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing battery life and faster charging, the LG Stylo 5 emerges as the better choice. Its 79-hour endurance rating and 20W charging significantly outperform the TCL A3, despite the A3's slightly newer chipset architecture. However, the A3 may appeal to those seeking a marginally more efficient processor.

PHONES
Phone Names TCL A3 LG Stylo 5
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900
4G bands2, 4, 5, 13, 662, 4, 5, 12, 14, 29, 30, 66
SpeedHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 MbpsHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2021, October2019, June. Released 2019, June
StatusAvailable. Released 2021, OctoberDiscontinued
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum back, aluminum frame
Dimensions145.8 x 71.1 x 9.9 mm (5.74 x 2.80 x 0.39 in)160 x 77.7 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 3.06 x 0.33 in)
SIMNano-SIMNano-SIM
Weight171 g (6.03 oz)179 g (6.31 oz)
 -Stylus
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~293 ppi density)1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~390 ppi density)
Size5.5 inches, 78.1 cm2 (~75.3% screen-to-body ratio)6.2 inches, 99.2 cm2 (~79.8% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeTFT LCDIPS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53Octa-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53
ChipsetMediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm)Qualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450 (14 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8320Adreno 506
OSAndroid 11Android 9.0 (Pie)
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal32GB 3GB RAM32GB 3GB RAM
 -eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flashLED flash, panorama, HDR
Single8 MP, 1/4.0", 1.12µm13 MP, PDAF
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Dual-16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm 8 MP
Single5 MP, 1/5.0", 1.12µm5 MP
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -Yes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE4.2, A2DP, LE
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPSGPS
RadioUnspecifiedNo
USBmicroUSB 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, proximityFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity
Battery
Charging-20W wired
TypeLi-Ion 3000 mAh, removableLi-Ion 3500 mAh, non-removable
Misc
ColorsBlackBlonde Rose, Platinum Gray
ModelsA509DLLM-Q720
PriceAbout 40 EURAbout 200 EUR
Tests
Audio quality- Noise-93.5dB / Crosstalk -92.0dB
Battery life- Endurance rating 79h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: 1485 (nominal), 3.218 (sunlight)
Loudspeaker- Voice 62dB / Noise 69dB / Ring 70dB
Performance- GeekBench: 4695 (v4.4) GFXBench: 6fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

TCL A3

  • Slightly newer processor architecture (12nm)
  • Potentially better power efficiency (theoretical)
  • Lower price point (likely, based on market positioning)

  • No published battery endurance rating
  • No published charging specifications
  • Lacks display contrast ratio data

LG Stylo 5

  • Excellent 79-hour battery endurance
  • Fast 20W wired charging
  • Superior display contrast ratio for outdoor visibility

  • Older 14nm processor
  • Slightly lower CPU clock speed
  • May be slightly more expensive

Display Comparison

The LG Stylo 5 boasts a notable advantage in display quality, evidenced by its contrast ratios of 1485 (nominal) and 3.218 (sunlight). This suggests significantly better visibility outdoors compared to the TCL A3, which lacks published contrast ratio data. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels common in this price bracket, the Stylo 5’s higher contrast indicates superior panel calibration or potentially a more advanced backlight unit. Bezels are likely comparable, given the similar target market, but the Stylo 5’s contrast ratio is a clear win for outdoor usability.

Camera Comparison

Both devices likely feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison. However, the market segment suggests both will rely on budget sensors and image processing. The presence of a 'Photo / Video' specification for the LG Stylo 5 is a minimal detail, while the TCL A3 lacks any camera specifics. It's safe to assume neither phone will excel in low-light conditions or offer advanced camera features. Focusing on the main sensor resolution and aperture would be crucial for a more accurate assessment, but this data is unavailable.

Performance

The TCL A3’s Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12nm) and the LG Stylo 5’s Qualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450 (14nm) represent a generational difference, but not necessarily a performance leap. The Helio P22, built on a smaller 12nm process, *should* theoretically offer better power efficiency. However, the Snapdragon 450’s clock speed of 1.8 GHz versus the A3’s 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 cores doesn’t guarantee a performance advantage in real-world usage. Both chipsets are designed for basic multitasking and light app usage; neither is suited for demanding games or intensive tasks. The 14nm process of the Snapdragon 450 may result in slightly higher power consumption under load, but the difference is unlikely to be substantial.

Battery Life

The LG Stylo 5’s 79-hour endurance rating is a standout feature, indicating exceptional battery life. This is further bolstered by its 20W wired charging capability, allowing for significantly faster top-ups compared to the TCL A3, which lacks published charging specifications. While the A3’s battery capacity is unknown, the Stylo 5’s endurance suggests a well-optimized combination of battery size and power efficiency. The 20W charging on the Stylo 5 translates to a much quicker 0-100% charge time, a significant convenience factor for users who rely on their phone throughout the day.

Buying Guide

Buy the TCL A3 if you prioritize a slightly newer processor architecture and are comfortable with slower charging speeds and potentially shorter battery life. This phone suits users who primarily use their device for basic tasks like messaging and light browsing. Buy the LG Stylo 5 if you value long-lasting battery life, faster charging, and a more usable display contrast ratio, making it ideal for users who rely heavily on their phone throughout the day and appreciate a more visible screen in sunlight.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 450 in the LG Stylo 5 struggle with multitasking compared to the Helio P22?
While the Helio P22 has a slightly higher clock speed, the Snapdragon 450 is generally well-optimized for basic multitasking. Both chipsets are designed for light usage, and the difference in performance will be negligible for typical tasks like switching between messaging apps, browsing the web, and listening to music. Neither phone is ideal for heavy multitasking or running demanding applications.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the LG Stylo 5 with the 20W charger?
With 20W charging, the LG Stylo 5 should fully charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 2 to 2.5 hours, depending on usage during charging. This is a significant improvement over the TCL A3, which likely charges at a much slower rate due to the lack of published charging specifications.
❓ Is the contrast ratio of the LG Stylo 5 really that noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the contrast ratio of 3.218 in sunlight is quite noticeable. It means the screen will remain much more readable outdoors or in brightly lit environments compared to a display with a lower contrast ratio. This is a significant advantage for users who frequently use their phone on the go.