TCL 60 SE vs. Motorola Moto G Stylus (2023): A Deep Dive into Budget Smartphone Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity, the TCL 60 SE emerges as the winner. Its significantly longer 49:13h battery endurance, coupled with a 1000-cycle lifespan promise, outweighs the slightly faster chipset of the Moto G Stylus. While the Motorola offers the convenience of a stylus, the TCL’s battery performance is a more impactful benefit for daily use.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | TCL 60 SE | Motorola Moto G Stylus (2023) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 41, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 03 | 2023, May 02 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July | Available. Released 2023, May 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.2 x 8.3 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 162.9 x 74.1 x 9.2 mm (6.41 x 2.92 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | Stylus Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G81 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G85 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 5200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Obsidian Black, Blizzard White | Blue, Rose Gold |
| Models | T517H | - |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 49:13h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
TCL 60 SE
- Exceptional 49:13h battery life
- 1000 charge cycle battery lifespan
- Faster 18W wired charging
- Potentially better value for money
- Potentially lower display quality to prioritize battery
- Slightly less powerful chipset compared to the Moto G Stylus
Motorola Moto G Stylus (2023)
- Integrated stylus for note-taking and navigation
- Slightly more powerful Helio G85 chipset
- Familiar Motorola user experience
- Potentially improved image processing
- Shorter battery life compared to the TCL 60 SE
- Slower 15W wired charging
- Stylus functionality may not be essential for all users
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize 12nm chipsets, suggesting similar power draw and thermal characteristics. However, display specifications are not provided, so a direct comparison is limited. We can infer that both likely employ LCD panels given their price points. The TCL 60 SE’s value proposition hinges on its battery, suggesting potential compromises in display quality to achieve that endurance. The Moto G Stylus, while offering the stylus, may also prioritize cost-effectiveness in its display selection.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not provided beyond the chipsets' ISP capabilities. Given the budget nature of both devices, we can expect competent but not exceptional camera performance. The Helio G85 in the Motorola may offer slightly improved image processing capabilities, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction. However, without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to assess the true camera quality. The presence of a stylus on the Motorola could also be leveraged for camera features like remote shutter control or photo editing.
Performance
Both the TCL 60 SE and Motorola Moto G Stylus (2023) are powered by octa-core CPUs featuring the same core configuration: 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55. However, the Motorola utilizes the Mediatek Helio G85 chipset, while the TCL employs the Helio G81. While seemingly minor, the G85 generally offers a slight performance edge due to optimizations in the GPU and image signal processor. This translates to marginally faster app loading times and smoother graphics in less demanding games. However, the difference is unlikely to be noticeable in everyday tasks. Both rely on the same CPU architecture, meaning the core processing power is comparable.
Battery Life
The TCL 60 SE truly shines in battery endurance, boasting an impressive 49:13h of usage time. This is a significant advantage over what we would expect from a phone in this price range. The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2023), while respectable, lags behind with an unspecified, but likely shorter, endurance. The TCL also benefits from a stated 1000 charge cycle lifespan, indicating long-term battery health. The Motorola’s 15W charging is slower than the TCL’s 18W wired charging, meaning the TCL will reach a full charge slightly faster, further enhancing its convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the TCL 60 SE if you need a phone that will reliably last through a full day – and then some – of heavy use, and if battery longevity is your primary concern. This is the phone for travelers, commuters, or anyone who dislikes frequent charging. Buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2023) if you frequently take handwritten notes, sketch, or prefer the added functionality of a stylus for navigation and quick interactions. The stylus is the key differentiator, but comes at the cost of battery performance.