TCL 60 SE NxtPaper vs. Google Pixel 7a: A Deep Dive into Battery, Camera, and Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day battery life and a comfortable reading experience, the TCL 60 SE NxtPaper is the clear winner. However, the Google Pixel 7a’s superior image processing and faster performance make it the better choice for photography enthusiasts and those demanding a smoother user experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | TCL 60 SE NxtPaper | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 03 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.2 x 8.2 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.5", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP, (ultrawide) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 5200 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Space Gray, Mint Green | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | T521K | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | £ 186.61 | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 46:38h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
TCL 60 SE NxtPaper
- Exceptional battery life (46:38h endurance)
- Unique NxtPaper display for comfortable reading
- More affordable price point
- Less powerful processor compared to the Pixel 7a
- Camera performance likely inferior to the Pixel 7a
Google Pixel 7a
- Superior camera quality and image processing
- Faster and more responsive performance with Tensor G2
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Shorter battery life compared to the TCL 60 SE NxtPaper
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 1070 nits, which translates to excellent visibility outdoors. While the TCL 60 SE NxtPaper’s brightness isn’t specified, its NxtPaper technology aims for eye comfort by mimicking the texture of paper, reducing glare and blue light. This is a key differentiator, benefiting users who spend hours reading or consuming content. The Pixel 7a’s higher brightness is advantageous for HDR content and direct sunlight viewing, but the TCL’s NxtPaper display offers a unique advantage for readability and eye strain reduction.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is its standout feature. While specific sensor details are missing for both, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor G2, elevates image quality significantly. The Pixel 7a excels in dynamic range, low-light performance, and overall image clarity. The TCL 60 SE NxtPaper’s camera is likely more focused on providing acceptable results for social media sharing, but it won’t match the Pixel’s detail and processing capabilities. The Pixel 7a’s video recording capabilities are also expected to be superior, benefiting from the Tensor G2’s image signal processor.
Performance
The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 chipset, fabricated on a 5nm process, offers a substantial performance advantage over the TCL 60 SE NxtPaper’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm). The Pixel’s CPU configuration – 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 and 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 – provides faster processing speeds for demanding tasks like video editing and gaming. While the Dimensity 6300 is capable for everyday use, the Tensor G2’s architecture and efficiency will result in smoother multitasking and a more responsive user experience. The 5nm process also contributes to better thermal management, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The TCL 60 SE NxtPaper’s 46:38h endurance rating is a major selling point, indicating exceptional battery life. This is likely achieved through a combination of the Dimensity 6300’s efficiency and a larger battery capacity (unspecified, but implied by the endurance). The Pixel 7a, with a reported 76h endurance (older rating, potentially less accurate with current software), falls behind in longevity. Both phones support 18W wired charging, but the Pixel 7a adds the convenience of 7.5W wireless charging and PD3.0 support for potentially faster wired charging speeds with compatible adapters.
Buying Guide
Buy the TCL 60 SE NxtPaper if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, and appreciate a display designed for extended reading. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prioritize camera quality, fast performance for apps and gaming, and seamless integration with the Google ecosystem, even if it means more frequent charging.