TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper vs. Realme 11 Pro+: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day (and multi-day) battery life, the TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper is the clear winner, boasting a remarkable 44:33h endurance. However, if fast charging and slightly better performance are paramount, the Realme 11 Pro+ with its 100W charging and Dimensity 7050 chipset takes the edge.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper | Realme 11 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - T803E | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA - T803D | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 04 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2023, May 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, leather or plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 167.6 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.60 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 161.6 x 73.9 x 8.2 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 183 g or 189 g (6.46 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 7 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 512GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.45", 0.64µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer (T803D only) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 100W wired |
| Type | 5010 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Moon Gray, Midnight Blue, Alps White, Pale Gold, Rosy Purple | Astral Black, Sunrise Beige, Oasis Green |
| Models | T803E, T803D | RMX3740, RMX3741 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 399.90 / ₹ 27,990 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 44:33h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper
- Exceptional battery life (44:33h endurance)
- NxtPaper display for eye comfort
- 1000 charge cycles for longevity
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Less powerful chipset compared to Realme
Realme 11 Pro+
- Faster chipset (Dimensity 7050)
- Ultra-fast 100W charging
- Brighter display (793 nits)
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Potentially less eye-friendly display
Display Comparison
The Realme 11 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 793 nits, making it more usable in direct sunlight. While the TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper’s display specs are not provided, its 'NxtPaper' technology suggests a focus on eye comfort and reduced blue light, potentially at the expense of peak brightness. The Realme’s higher brightness is a boon for media consumption, while the TCL’s display is geared towards prolonged reading and reduced eye strain. We lack information on panel type (LTPO, AMOLED) for either device, but the Realme’s brightness suggests a high-quality AMOLED panel.
Camera Comparison
The Realme 11 Pro+ is likely to offer a more versatile camera system, though detailed sensor information is limited. The presence of 'Photo / Video' suggests a focus on both aspects, and Realme’s marketing often emphasizes camera capabilities. The TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper’s camera specs are not provided, making a direct comparison difficult. However, given its focus on other features, it’s reasonable to assume the camera is a secondary consideration. Without knowing sensor sizes or apertures, it’s difficult to assess image quality, but the Realme’s likely larger sensor and more advanced image processing will likely yield better results in low-light conditions.
Performance
Both phones utilize Mediatek Dimensity chipsets fabricated on a 6nm process, but the Realme 11 Pro+’s Dimensity 7050 holds a performance advantage over the TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper’s Dimensity 6300. The 7050 features a faster CPU configuration – 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores versus the 6300’s 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores – translating to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. While both chipsets share the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores (6x2.0 GHz), the Realme’s superior CPU clock speed and potentially more aggressive GPU tuning will benefit gamers and power users. The TCL’s focus appears to be on efficiency, complementing its long battery life.
Battery Life
The TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper’s standout feature is its exceptional battery endurance, rated at 44:33 hours. This dwarfs the Realme 11 Pro+'s reported 112 hours (which is likely a misreporting of standby time, not usage). The TCL’s endurance suggests a larger battery capacity and/or more efficient power management. However, the Realme 11 Pro+ compensates with its 100W wired charging, capable of replenishing the battery far faster than the TCL’s 33W charging. While the TCL offers longevity, the Realme offers convenience – a quick 10-minute charge could provide hours of usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, appreciate a less-straining display for extended reading, and value longevity over raw speed. Buy the Realme 11 Pro+ if you prefer the convenience of incredibly fast charging, demand a bit more processing power for gaming or demanding apps, and prioritize a brighter, more vibrant display.