TCL 50 LE vs Google Pixel 7a: A Detailed Comparison for Smart Buyers
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and software experience, the Google Pixel 7a is the clear winner. Its Tensor G2 chipset and superior image processing justify the higher price. However, the TCL 50 LE provides exceptional value for those on a tight budget who need a functional and reliable smartphone.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | TCL 50 LE | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 20, 28, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 26 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, July 05 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 75.4 x 9 mm (6.48 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide), AF Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Storm Gray | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | T510SP | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 80 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
TCL 50 LE
- Significantly lower price point
- Large 50-inch display for immersive viewing
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Pixel 7a
- Inferior camera quality
- Likely slower software updates
Google Pixel 7a
- Powerful Google Tensor G2 chipset
- Exceptional camera performance with Google’s software
- Guaranteed software updates and features
- Higher price tag
- Smaller display size
- Wireless charging is relatively slow at 7.5W
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1070 nits, compared to the TCL 50 LE’s unspecified brightness. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the TCL 50 LE’s large 50-inch screen is advantageous for media consumption, the Pixel 7a’s smaller, brighter panel offers a more vibrant and usable experience in various lighting conditions. We expect the TCL to use an IPS LCD panel, while the Pixel 7a likely uses OLED, offering superior contrast ratios.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is a major differentiator. While specific sensor details are missing for both, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor G2, elevates image quality significantly. The Pixel 7a excels in dynamic range, low-light performance, and overall image processing. The TCL 50 LE will likely offer a serviceable camera for casual snapshots, but it won’t match the Pixel 7a’s consistency and detail. The Pixel 7a’s video capabilities are also expected to be superior, benefiting from advanced stabilization and processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 (5nm) is a substantial upgrade over the TCL 50 LE’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The Tensor G2’s Cortex-X1 prime core, clocked at 2.85 GHz, provides significantly faster single-core performance, crucial for app responsiveness and demanding tasks. The 5nm fabrication process also contributes to better power efficiency. While the Dimensity 700 is adequate for everyday use, the Pixel 7a will handle multitasking, gaming, and AI-powered features with greater ease. The Pixel 7a also benefits from potentially faster RAM (likely LPDDR5x) compared to the TCL 50 LE.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, suggesting excellent battery life despite not having a massive battery capacity. The TCL 50 LE’s battery capacity is unknown, but its less powerful chipset and larger screen size may result in shorter battery life. Both phones support 18W wired charging, but the Pixel 7a adds the convenience of 7.5W wireless charging and PD3.0 support for faster wired charging with compatible adapters. This provides more flexible charging options for Pixel 7a users.
Buying Guide
Buy the TCL 50 LE if you need a large-screen phone for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and streaming, and your budget is under $200. You'll appreciate its affordability and decent battery life. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prioritize camera performance, a smooth software experience with guaranteed updates, and the power of Google’s AI features, and are willing to spend more for these benefits.