TCL 50 5G vs Motorola Moto G Power 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G Power 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 930 chipset, featuring Cortex-A78 cores, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the TCL 50 5G’s Dimensity 6100+, making it better suited for demanding apps and multitasking. While the TCL 50 5G offers a slightly newer chipset, the Motorola’s superior CPU architecture delivers a more tangible benefit.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | TCL 50 5G | Motorola Moto G Power 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 2, 5, 7, 12, 25, 30, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 26 | 2023, April 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April | Available. Released 2023, April 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 75.1 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 163.1 x 74.8 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183.5 g (6.49 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 14, planned upgrade to Android 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.5", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 5010 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Dark Blue, Space Gray | Dark Blue |
| Models | T613P, T613K | - |
| Price | € 148.07 / £ 91.97 | $ 97.90 / £ 199.00 |
TCL 50 5G
- Slightly faster charging (18W vs 15W)
- Newer chipset generation (Dimensity 6100+)
- Potentially better display optimization due to ISP
- Inferior CPU architecture (Cortex-A76 vs A78)
- Likely less powerful ISP for image processing
- May exhibit more performance throttling under sustained load
Motorola Moto G Power 5G
- Superior CPU performance (Cortex-A78 cores)
- More powerful ISP for better image quality
- Potentially longer software support due to chipset capabilities
- Slower charging speed (15W)
- Older chipset generation (Dimensity 930)
- May not be as efficient in extremely light tasks
Display Comparison
Neither TCL nor Motorola provide display specifications beyond resolution in their marketing materials. However, given the price point, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The real difference lies under the hood. The TCL 50 5G’s Dimensity 6100+ may offer slightly better image signal processing for display optimization, but without detailed color accuracy or brightness data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. Bezels are expected to be comparable, typical of this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is challenging. Both phones likely feature a primary camera and depth/macro sensors. However, the Dimensity 930 in the Motorola Moto G Power 5G offers a more powerful image signal processor (ISP), potentially leading to better image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range. The TCL 50 5G’s ISP, while capable, is likely less sophisticated. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is unknown for both devices, but its absence would be more noticeable on the Motorola given its more capable primary sensor potential.
Performance
The core differentiator here is the chipset. The Motorola Moto G Power 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 930, built on a 6nm process, boasts a significant architectural advantage with its two 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. These A78 cores are a generation ahead of the Cortex-A76 cores found in the TCL 50 5G’s Dimensity 6100+. While both chips feature the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the A78’s superior single-core performance translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. The 6nm fabrication process is identical, suggesting similar thermal efficiency, but the A78 architecture will likely sustain higher clock speeds for longer periods. The TCL 50 5G’s newer chipset doesn’t compensate for the older core design.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G Power 5G’s 15W charging is slower than the TCL 50 5G’s 18W charging. However, the Dimensity 930’s superior efficiency could offset this difference in real-world usage. The TCL 50 5G will likely achieve a faster 0-100% charge time, but the Motorola may offer comparable battery life due to its more efficient processor. Without knowing the battery capacity of each device, it’s difficult to definitively state which offers superior endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the TCL 50 5G if you prioritize a newer chipset generation and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like browsing, social media, and light streaming. Buy the Motorola Moto G Power 5G if you value smoother performance in demanding applications, enjoy occasional gaming, and appreciate the potential for longer software support due to the more powerful processor.