TCL 408 vs TCL 40 SE: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The TCL 40 SE emerges as the clear winner thanks to its faster processor, significantly quicker 18W charging, and generally improved performance. While the 408 is a decent budget option, the 40 SE provides a noticeable upgrade for a small price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | TCL 408 | TCL 40 SE |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - T507A, T507U, T507U1, T507U2, T507J | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - T610K |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 13, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - T507U, T507U1, T507U2 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 13, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - T610K |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/75 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/75 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28 - T507D1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 38, 40, 66 - T610E, T610P | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 05 | 2023, January 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 31 | Available. Released 2023, April 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 75.4 x 9 mm (6.48 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 167.9 x 76.5 x 8.5 mm (6.61 x 3.01 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio G37 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13, TCL UI 5.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (T507U only) | Yes (T610K, T610K2, T610P, T610P2) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5010 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gravity Grey, Midnight Blue | Dark grey, Twilight purple |
| Models | T507D1, T507A, T507U, T507U1, T507U2, T507J | T610K |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 120 EUR |
TCL 408
- Very affordable
- Decent battery life
- Basic functionality
- Slow performance
- Slow charging
- Limited camera capabilities
TCL 40 SE
- Faster processor
- Faster charging (18W)
- Improved camera
- Better overall performance
- Slightly more expensive than the 408
- Still a budget phone with limitations
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar display technology (likely IPS LCD) and resolution (likely HD+). The 40 SE might have slightly better color accuracy or brightness, but differences will be minimal. Expect a decent viewing experience for everyday use.
Camera Comparison
While both phones likely have a multi-lens setup (likely including a main sensor, ultrawide, and macro), the 40 SE's processor and potentially improved image processing algorithms should result in better image quality, especially in low light. Expect more detail and less noise in photos taken with the 40 SE.
Performance
The Helio G37 in the TCL 40 SE offers a tangible performance boost over the Helio G25 in the 408. Expect snappier app loading, smoother multitasking, and better overall responsiveness on the 40 SE. The 408 will feel noticeably slower, especially with demanding apps.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have a similar battery capacity (around 5000mAh). However, the 40 SE's 18W fast charging significantly reduces charging times compared to the 408's 10W charging. This is a major advantage for users who need to top up their phone quickly.
Buying Guide
The TCL 408 is a good choice for users on the absolute tightest budget who prioritize basic functionality and don't need fast charging. The TCL 40 SE is ideal for those who want a smoother experience, faster charging, and a slightly more capable camera system without breaking the bank.