Looking for an affordable smartphone without sacrificing too many features? The TCL 40 XE and 40 SE are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one offers the best value for your money? This comprehensive comparison will help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The TCL 40 XE takes the win thanks to its significantly more powerful Dimensity 700 chipset, offering noticeably better performance for everyday tasks and gaming. While the 40 SE is a solid option, the XE's processing power makes it the superior choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 - USA | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - T610K |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 - USA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 13, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - T610K |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/75 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | eMMC 5.1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 38, 40, 66 - T610E, T610P |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 26 | 2023, January 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, June | Available. Released 2023, April 04 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 75.4 x 0 mm (6.48 x 2.97 x 0.0 in) | 167.9 x 76.5 x 8.5 mm (6.61 x 3.01 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio G37 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 13, TCL UI | Android 13, TCL UI 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (T610K, T610K2, T610P, T610P2) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5010 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Starlight Black | Dark grey, Twilight purple |
| Models | T609SPP | T610K |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 120 EUR |
| SAR | 1.38 W/kg (head) 1.12 W/kg (body) | - |
TCL 40 XE
- Significantly faster processor
- Better performance for gaming
- Potentially slightly better display color accuracy
- All-day battery life
- May be slightly more expensive than the 40 SE
- Design might be less appealing to some
TCL 40 SE
- More affordable
- Decent battery life
- Good for basic tasks
- Sleek design
- Slower processor
- Less responsive performance
- May struggle with demanding apps
- Image processing could be better
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.6-inch IPS LCD display with a 720 x 1600 resolution. While the screens are similar in size and resolution, the 40 XE might offer slightly better color accuracy due to its more modern chipset. Expect decent viewing angles and brightness for everyday use, but don't expect flagship-level display quality.
Camera Comparison
The TCL 40 SE typically features a 50MP main camera, while the 40 XE often has a similar or slightly improved main sensor. Image quality is generally comparable in good lighting conditions, but the 40 XE's more powerful processor may allow for slightly better image processing. Low-light performance is likely to be average on both devices.
Performance
This is where the TCL 40 XE truly shines. The Dimensity 700 chipset is a substantial upgrade over the Helio G37. Expect faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall experience. The 40 SE will handle basic tasks adequately, but may struggle with more demanding apps or games.
Battery Life
Both phones typically offer a 5000mAh battery, promising all-day battery life. Actual battery performance will depend on usage patterns, but both should comfortably last a full day for moderate users. Charging speeds are identical at 18W wired.
Buying Guide
The TCL 40 XE is ideal for users who prioritize performance and want a smoother experience with apps and games. The TCL 40 SE is a good fit for those on a tighter budget who primarily use their phone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and social media.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the TCL 40 XE worth the extra money?
If performance is a priority, then yes. The Dimensity 700 chipset provides a noticeable upgrade over the Helio G37, making the 40 XE a more enjoyable device to use.
❓ Which TCL 40 phone has better battery life?
Both phones typically offer excellent battery life, around a full day of use. Actual performance will vary based on usage.