TCL 40 XE vs. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022): A Budget Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) edges out the TCL 40 XE thanks to its superior chipset, 5G connectivity, and faster charging. While the TCL offers a competitive price, the Moto's performance and stylus integration make it the better choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | TCL 40 XE | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 - USA | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 - USA | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - USA |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 5, 12, 14, 24, 26, 29, 30, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA - USA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| eMMC 5.1 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 26 | 2022, April 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, June | Available. Released 2022, April 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 75.4 x 0 mm (6.48 x 2.97 x 0.0 in) | 168.9 x 75.8 x 9.3 mm (6.65 x 2.98 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| - | Stylus Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 13, TCL UI | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0, 1.12µm Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 10W wired, QC3 |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starlight Black | Steel Blue, Seafoam Green |
| Models | T609SPP | XT2215, XT2215-1, XT2215-2, XT2215-3, XT2215-4 |
| Price | About 100 EUR | $ 66.60 |
| SAR | 1.38 W/kg (head) 1.12 W/kg (body) | - |
TCL 40 XE
- Affordable price
- Large display
- Decent battery life
- Less powerful chipset
- Slower charging
- Mediocre camera performance
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022)
- Powerful Snapdragon 695 5G
- 5G connectivity
- Stylus included
- Faster charging (QC3)
- Better camera
- Slightly higher price
- Stylus may not be essential for all users
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large displays, but the Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) typically has a slightly higher resolution and potentially better color accuracy. The TCL 40 XE's display is generally adequate for its price point, but may lack the vibrancy of the Moto.
Camera Comparison
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) generally boasts a more versatile camera system, often including a higher resolution main sensor and potentially better image processing. While the TCL 40 XE's camera is decent, it may struggle in low-light conditions compared to the Moto.
Performance
The Snapdragon 695 5G in the Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) is significantly more powerful than the Dimensity 700 in the TCL 40 XE. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Moto. The TCL is adequate for basic tasks.
Battery Life
Both phones offer large batteries, but the Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) benefits from more efficient charging with QC3 support, while the TCL is limited to 18W. Battery life will likely be comparable in real-world usage, but the Moto offers faster top-ups.
Buying Guide
The TCL 40 XE is ideal for users prioritizing affordability and a large display for media consumption. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) is perfect for those needing a stylus for note-taking or drawing, and who value 5G connectivity and a smoother overall experience.