TCL 305 vs TCL 30 SE: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The TCL 30 SE edges out the 305 thanks to its superior processor (Octa-core vs Quad-core), faster charging (15W vs 10W), and generally smoother performance. While both are budget options, the 30 SE provides a more compelling overall experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | TCL 305 | TCL 30 SE |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - 6102D | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - EMEA/APAC |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - 6102D | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - EMEA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 26, 28, 66 - 6102А | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 26, 28, 66 - LATAM | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 31 | 2022, February 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February | Available. Released 2022, April 20 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.50 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 165.2 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.50 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition), TCL UI | Android 12, TCL UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 28mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (6165H/6165H1 only) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Space Gray, Atlantic Blue | Atlantic Blue, Space Gray, Glacial Blue |
| Models | 6102D, 5164D | 6165H, 6156H1, 6165A, 6165A1, 6165S |
| Price | About 200 EUR | - |
TCL 305
- Very affordable
- Decent battery life
- Lightweight design
- Slow performance
- Slow charging
- Basic camera
- Limited storage
TCL 30 SE
- Better performance (Octa-core)
- Faster charging (15W)
- More versatile camera (triple lens)
- Slightly better display
- Slightly more expensive than 305
- Still a budget phone (performance limitations)
- Camera still not exceptional
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.55-inch HD+ display, offering decent viewing angles and color reproduction for the price. However, the 30 SE might have slightly better brightness due to its panel technology (likely IPS for both, but potential minor variations). Expect similar viewing experiences overall.
Camera Comparison
The TCL 30 SE typically features a triple camera setup (13MP main + 2MP macro + 2MP depth) while the 305 has a dual camera setup (13MP main + 2MP depth). While megapixels aren't everything, the 30 SE's additional macro lens offers more versatility. Image quality on both is acceptable for casual snapshots in good lighting, but don't expect stellar results. Low-light performance will be similar and not particularly impressive.
Performance
This is where the 30 SE shines. The Helio G25's Octa-core processor provides a noticeable performance boost over the 305's Quad-core Helio A22. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user interface on the 30 SE. The 305 will feel a bit sluggish, especially with demanding apps.
Battery Life
Both phones pack a 5000mAh battery, promising all-day battery life. However, the 30 SE's faster 15W charging means you'll spend less time plugged in. The 305's 10W charging is considerably slower.
Buying Guide
The TCL 305 is a good choice for users prioritizing a very basic smartphone experience and extremely tight budgets. The TCL 30 SE is better suited for those who want a slightly more responsive device, faster charging, and a bit more future-proofing.