The TCL 305 and Motorola Moto E32 (India) represent the extreme end of the budget smartphone spectrum. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at the lowest possible price point, but they take different approaches to achieving this. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device offers the best value for users prioritizing performance and everyday usability.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Motorola Moto E32 (India) is the superior choice. Its Helio G37 chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU, provides a noticeable performance boost over the TCL 305’s quad-core Helio A22. While both phones share the same slow 10W charging, the E32’s processing power makes it better suited for multitasking and light gaming.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - 6102D | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - 6102D | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 26, 28, 66 - 6102А | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 31 | 2022, October 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.50 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 164 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition), TCL UI | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) 1/5.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0, 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Space Gray, Atlantic Blue | Iceberg Blue, Cosmic Black |
| Models | 6102D, 5164D | - |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 130 EUR |
TCL 305
- Potentially lower price point
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Decent battery life (estimated)
- Significantly weaker performance
- Struggles with multitasking
- Limited gaming capabilities
Motorola Moto E32 (India)
- Faster and more responsive performance
- Better multitasking capabilities
- More suitable for light gaming
- Slow 10W charging
- Potentially slightly higher price
- Camera performance likely similar to TCL 305
Display Comparison
Neither TCL nor Motorola provide detailed display specifications for these models. Given their price point, both likely utilize LCD panels with 720p+ resolution. The focus here isn't on display quality, but rather on the overall user experience. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices. Color accuracy will likely be standard for this segment, prioritizing power efficiency over vibrant colors.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar on both devices, relying on software processing to enhance image quality. Both will likely feature a primary camera and potentially a depth sensor. Given the market segment, detailed analysis is limited by the lack of sensor size or aperture information. Expect acceptable results in good lighting conditions, but significant noise and softness in low light. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic and offers limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto E32 (India) boasts the Mediatek Helio G37, an octa-core processor with four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.3 GHz and another four at 1.8 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the TCL 305’s Helio A22, a quad-core processor clocked at 2.0 GHz, also using Cortex-A53 cores. The G37’s octa-core configuration and higher clock speeds translate to significantly improved multitasking and app launch times. While both are 12nm chips, the architectural advantage of the G37 is substantial. The E32 will handle more demanding apps and light gaming with greater ease, while the 305 may struggle with even moderate workloads.
Battery Life
Both the TCL 305 and Motorola Moto E32 (India) are equipped with 10W wired charging, indicating a slow charging experience. A full 0-100% charge will likely take over 2.5 hours. Battery capacity is not specified, but both will likely hover around the 5000mAh mark, prioritizing all-day battery life over fast charging. The slightly more efficient Helio G37 in the Moto E32 might offer a marginal improvement in battery endurance, but the difference will be minimal.
Buying Guide
Buy the TCL 305 if your primary need is a basic, reliable phone for calls, texts, and extremely light app usage, and you are on the tightest of budgets. Buy the Motorola Moto E32 (India) if you want a more responsive experience for social media, occasional gaming, and smoother multitasking, even if it means spending a little more. The E32 is the better all-rounder.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Motorola Moto E32 (India) run PUBG Mobile smoothly?
While the Helio G37 can handle PUBG Mobile, expect to play at low to medium settings with a stable but not exceptionally high frame rate. It's not a dedicated gaming phone, but it's significantly more capable than the TCL 305 for this purpose.
❓ Is the TCL 305 a good option for elderly users who primarily make calls and send texts?
Yes, the TCL 305 is a suitable option for basic use cases like calls and texts. Its simplicity and potentially lower price make it an attractive choice for users who don't require advanced features or performance.
❓ How much storage do these phones typically come with, and is it expandable?
Both phones typically come with 32GB of internal storage, which is quite limited. Fortunately, both support microSD card expansion, allowing you to add up to 512GB or 1TB of additional storage, depending on the model.
❓ What version of Android do these phones run, and will they receive software updates?
Both devices likely ship with Android 12 (Go Edition) due to their limited processing power and RAM. Software update support is limited in this price segment; expect minimal updates beyond security patches, if any.
