The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for those seeking essential features without breaking the bank. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the TCL 305 and the Motorola Moto E32. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see which phone emerges as the winner.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Motorola Moto E32 takes the crown. Its superior chipset, faster charging, and generally more modern features provide a noticeably better user experience than the TCL 305, despite both being budget-friendly options. The Moto E32 offers a more compelling package overall.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - 6102D | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - 6102D | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 26, 28, 66 - 6102А | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 31 | 2022, May 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February | Available. Released 2022, May 05 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.50 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 164 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 184 g (6.49 oz) |
| | - | Water repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~268 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition), TCL UI | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) 1/5.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Space Gray, Atlantic Blue | Misty Silver, Pearl Blue, Slate Grey |
| Models | 6102D, 5164D | - |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 150 EUR |
TCL 305
- Very affordable
- Simple and easy to use
- Decent battery life (likely)
- Slow performance
- Basic camera
- Slow charging
- Outdated chipset
Motorola Moto E32
- Better performance
- Faster charging
- Improved camera
- More modern design
- Good value for money
- May lack some premium features
- Plastic build (common in this price range)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature HD+ displays, likely around 6.5 inches. However, the Moto E32 often boasts a slightly higher resolution and potentially better color accuracy. The TCL 305 might have a more basic LCD panel, while the Moto E32 could feature a slightly improved one, though both will be adequate for everyday use.
Camera Comparison
The Moto E32 generally offers a more versatile camera system, often including a higher resolution main sensor and potentially an ultrawide lens. While both phones will produce decent photos in good lighting, the Moto E32 is likely to capture more detail and offer better low-light performance. The TCL 305's camera is likely adequate but not exceptional.
Performance
This is where the Moto E32 shines. Its Unisoc T606 chipset with an octa-core processor (including Cortex-A75 cores) significantly outperforms the TCL 305's quad-core Helio A22. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive overall experience on the Moto E32. The TCL 305 will feel noticeably slower.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have batteries in the 5000mAh range. However, the Moto E32's 18W fast charging provides a significant advantage, allowing for quicker top-ups compared to the TCL 305's 10W charging.
Buying Guide
The TCL 305 is best suited for users who prioritize simplicity and a very basic smartphone experience, perhaps as a secondary device or for those on an extremely tight budget. The Motorola Moto E32 is ideal for users seeking a smoother, more responsive experience with better performance, a more capable camera, and faster charging – all while remaining budget-conscious.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Motorola Moto E32 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful chipset. The TCL 305 will struggle with even basic games.
❓ How much storage do these phones offer?
Both typically offer 32GB or 64GB of storage, expandable via microSD card. Check specific model variants for exact storage options.