The TCL 305 and Infinix Smart 6 Plus (India) represent the fiercely competitive sub-$150 smartphone market. Both devices aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price point, but they differ significantly in their core processing power. This comparison dissects those differences, focusing on the impact of the Mediatek Helio A22 versus the Helio G25 on everyday use and light gaming.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and occasional gaming, the Infinix Smart 6 Plus (India) is the better choice. Its Helio G25 chipset, with its octa-core configuration, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the TCL 305’s quad-core Helio A22, making it more suitable for multitasking and demanding apps.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - 6102D | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - 6102D | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 26, 28, 66 - 6102А | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 31 | 2022, July 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February | Available. Released 2022, August 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.50 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 172.6 x 77.7 x 8.7 mm (6.80 x 3.06 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~257 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 112.3 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 440 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition), TCL UI | Android 12 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM | 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.0 |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Space Gray, Atlantic Blue | Tranquil Sea Blue, Miracle Black |
| Models | 6102D, 5164D | X6823C, X6823 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 100 EUR |
TCL 305
- Potentially simpler software experience due to lower processing power.
- May offer slightly longer standby time due to less background activity.
- Generally lower price point.
- Significantly slower performance in multitasking and app loading.
- Struggles with demanding apps and games.
- Less responsive user interface.
Infinix Smart 6 Plus (India)
- Noticeably faster performance thanks to the octa-core Helio G25.
- Better suited for multitasking and light gaming.
- More responsive user interface.
- Potentially slightly shorter battery life under heavy use.
- May be marginally more expensive than the TCL 305.
- Software optimization can impact performance.
Display Comparison
Neither TCL nor Infinix provide detailed display specifications beyond resolution. However, given the price bracket, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The real difference lies in the processing power driving the UI, impacting perceived smoothness. While display quality is likely similar, the G25 in the Infinix will render animations and transitions more fluidly.
Camera Comparison
Both phones likely feature basic camera setups, and detailed sensor information is scarce. Focusing on the chipset’s image signal processor (ISP), the Helio G25 in the Infinix Smart 6 Plus offers a more capable ISP, potentially resulting in slightly better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. However, the overall camera experience will be heavily dependent on software optimization, which is often limited in this price segment. Expect similar results in good lighting conditions.
Performance
The core distinction between these phones is the chipset. The TCL 305’s Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 is a quad-core processor clocked at 2.0 GHz, utilizing Cortex-A53 cores. The Infinix Smart 6 Plus (India) boasts the Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25, an octa-core chip featuring four Cortex-A53 cores at 2.0 GHz and four power-efficient Cortex-A53 cores at 1.5 GHz. This octa-core configuration provides a significant advantage in multitasking and handling more complex applications. The G25’s integrated GPU also offers better graphics performance, making it more suitable for light gaming. The A22 will struggle with graphically intensive titles.
Battery Life
Both devices are expected to feature similar battery capacities (around 5000mAh, based on market trends). However, the Helio G25’s more efficient architecture, despite its higher core count, could translate to slightly better battery life under moderate usage. Both phones utilize 10W charging, meaning slow charging speeds – expect over 3 hours for a full charge from 0%.
Buying Guide
Buy the TCL 305 if you need a basic, reliable smartphone for calls, texts, and light social media use, and prioritize simplicity over performance. It’s ideal for first-time smartphone users or those seeking a secondary device. Buy the Infinix Smart 6 Plus (India) if you prefer a phone capable of handling more demanding tasks like video streaming, moderate gaming, and running multiple apps simultaneously, offering a smoother overall experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Infinix Smart 6 Plus (India) run PUBG Mobile smoothly?
While the Helio G25 can technically run PUBG Mobile, expect to play at the lowest graphics settings and potentially experience occasional frame drops. It's not optimized for a high-end PUBG experience, but it's playable for casual gamers.
❓ Is the TCL 305 a good option for elderly users who primarily make calls and send texts?
Yes, the TCL 305 is an excellent choice for elderly users with basic needs. Its simpler interface and lower processing demands make it easy to use, and the battery life will likely be sufficient for their usage patterns.
❓ Does the Helio A22 in the TCL 305 struggle with popular social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp?
The Helio A22 can run Facebook and WhatsApp, but you may experience noticeable lag when scrolling through feeds or loading images, especially with multiple apps open simultaneously. The Infinix Smart 6 Plus will offer a smoother experience with these apps.
❓ What type of storage does each phone use, and is it expandable?
While not explicitly stated, both phones likely utilize eMMC storage, common in this price range. Both are expected to have a dedicated microSD card slot for storage expansion, allowing users to add more space for photos, videos, and apps.
