TCL 30 vs. Motorola Moto G51 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Motorola Moto G51 5G edges out the TCL 30 thanks to its 5G connectivity, brighter display, and more efficient chipset. While the TCL 30 offers a slightly simpler experience, the Moto G51 5G provides a more future-proof and visually appealing package for a similar price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | TCL 30 | Motorola Moto G51 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Europe, Asia, Saudi Arabia |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 - Europe/Asia |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Europe/Asia |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 27 | 2021, November 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 20 | Available. Released 2021, December 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 75.2 x 7.7 mm (6.48 x 2.96 x 0.30 in) | 170.5 x 76.5 x 9.1 mm (6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 650 nits (typ), 900 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, TCL UI 4.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 28mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm - Global or 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm - China only |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD/Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 20W wired (India) 10W wired (Global) |
| Type | Li-Po 5010 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Tech Black, Muse Blue | Indigo Blue, Bright Silver, Aqua Blue |
| Models | T676H | XT2171-2, XT2171-1 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 210 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 124h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1634:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 302859 (v9) GeekBench: 1696 (v5.1) GFXBench: 26fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
TCL 30
- Simple and straightforward Android experience
- Decent battery life
- Affordable price
- Less powerful processor
- Lower display brightness
- No 5G connectivity
Motorola Moto G51 5G
- 5G connectivity
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- More powerful processor
- Good battery life
- Charging speed varies by region (10W or 20W)
- Potential for slightly more bloatware
Display Comparison
The Moto G51 5G boasts a significant advantage with its measured 595 nits peak brightness, making it much easier to view outdoors. Both phones share a high 1634:1 contrast ratio, promising deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Moto G51 5G's display is generally considered superior due to its brightness and potentially better color accuracy, though both offer a decent viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is generally comparable between the two, with both offering decent image quality in good lighting conditions. However, the Moto G51 5G's image processing might be slightly more refined. Low-light performance is likely to be similar, with both phones benefiting from good lighting. Specific camera specs are not provided, so a direct comparison is difficult, but the Moto G51 5G likely has a slight edge.
Performance
The Snapdragon 480+ 5G in the Moto G51 5G is noticeably more powerful than the Helio G37 in the TCL 30. The Snapdragon's 8nm process also contributes to better power efficiency. Expect smoother app loading, faster multitasking, and better gaming performance on the Moto G51 5G. The TCL 30 is adequate for basic tasks but may struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones advertise impressive battery life, with the Moto G51 5G claiming an endurance rating of 124 hours. While real-world usage varies, the Moto G51 5G's more efficient chipset likely contributes to longer battery life. The TCL 30's battery performance is still respectable, but the Moto G51 5G has a clear advantage.
Buying Guide
The TCL 30 is a good choice for users prioritizing simplicity and a straightforward Android experience. The Moto G51 5G is ideal for those wanting 5G connectivity, a vibrant display, and a slightly more powerful processor for smoother multitasking and gaming.