The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for your money. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the TCL 30+ and the Samsung Galaxy A04. Both promise affordability, but which one delivers the better overall experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The TCL 30+ edges out the Galaxy A04 thanks to its slightly faster chipset and faster charging. While both are budget options, the TCL offers a marginally better performance and a more convenient charging experience, making it the slightly better choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM) | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - EMEA/APAC | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - EMEA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 26, 28, 38, 40, 66 - LATAM | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 27 | 2022, August 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 20 | Available. Released 2022, October 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 75.2 x 7.7 mm (6.48 x 2.96 x 0.30 in) | 164.4 x 76.3 x 9.1 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 650 nits (typ), 900 nits (peak) | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12, TCL UI 4.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, One UI Core 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | - | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 28mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.3, 19mm (ultrawide), 1/3", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), 1/5", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (T676K only) | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 5010 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Tech Black, Muse Blue | Black, Green, White, Copper |
| Models | T676K, T676J | SM-A045F, SM-A045F/DS, SM-A045M |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 70 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.32 W/kg (head) 1.10 W/kg (body) |
TCL 30+
- Slightly faster chipset (Helio G37)
- Faster 18W charging
- Triple camera setup with macro lens
- Generally better value for performance
- Plastic build quality
- Software updates may be less frequent than Samsung
Samsung Galaxy A04
- Samsung's One UI interface (familiar to Samsung users)
- Reliable brand reputation
- Good battery life
- Slower charging (likely 10W)
- Less powerful chipset (Helio P35)
- Dual camera setup lacks versatility
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch display, likely with an HD+ resolution. While the TCL 30+ might have slightly better color accuracy due to TCL's display technology, the difference will be minimal for everyday use. Samsung's display might benefit from their experience in display manufacturing, but both are likely to be adequate for the price point.
Camera Comparison
The TCL 30+ typically features a triple camera setup (50MP main, 2MP depth, 2MP macro), while the Galaxy A04 usually has a dual camera setup (50MP main, 2MP depth). While megapixels aren't everything, the TCL's additional macro lens offers more versatility. Image quality will be decent in good lighting conditions for both, but expect noise and limited detail in low light.
Performance
The TCL 30+ utilizes a Mediatek Helio G37, while the Galaxy A04 uses a Helio P35. The G37 generally offers a slight performance advantage, particularly in graphics-intensive tasks. Expect smoother multitasking and slightly better gaming performance on the TCL 30+. Both will struggle with demanding games at high settings.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have a 5000mAh battery, providing all-day battery life for moderate users. However, the TCL 30+ supports 18W fast charging, while the Galaxy A04 likely supports standard 10W charging. This means the TCL 30+ will charge significantly faster.
Buying Guide
The TCL 30+ is ideal for users prioritizing a bit more performance and faster charging within a tight budget. The Samsung Galaxy A04 is a good option for those deeply invested in the Samsung ecosystem and prefer a familiar user interface, even if it means sacrificing a little performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Samsung generally offers better and more consistent software updates compared to TCL, although both are budget brands.
❓ Can I play demanding games on either of these phones?
Neither phone is ideal for demanding games. Both will struggle with high settings. Casual games will run fine on both.