Realme 9 Pro+ vs TCL 30+: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme 9 Pro+ is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 920 chipset delivers significantly faster performance than the TCL 30+'s Helio G37, and the 60W charging dramatically reduces downtime. While the TCL 30+ offers a lower entry price, the Realme 9 Pro+'s advantages justify the cost for those who value speed and convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | TCL 30+ | Realme 9 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM) | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - EMEA/APAC | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - EMEA | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 26, 28, 38, 40, 66 - LATAM | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 27 | 2022, February 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 20 | Available. Released 2022, February 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 75.2 x 7.7 mm (6.48 x 2.96 x 0.30 in) | 160.2 x 73.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 650 nits (typ), 900 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, TCL UI 4.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 28mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.3, 19mm (ultrawide), 1/3", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (T676K only) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 60W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 44 min (advertised) |
| Type | Li-Po 5010 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Tech Black, Muse Blue | Midnight Black, Aurora Green, Sunrise Blue, Free Fire Limited Edition |
| Models | T676K, T676J | RMX3392, RMX3393 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | € 289.90 / $ 390.00 / ₹ 25,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.73 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 495096 (v8), 416031 (v9) GeekBench: 2335 (v5.1) GFXBench: 27fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
TCL 30+
- More affordable price point
- Potentially longer battery life (depending on capacity)
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Significantly slower performance
- Slow 18W charging
- Likely inferior camera quality
Realme 9 Pro+
- Much faster performance with Dimensity 920
- Ultra-fast 60W charging
- Likely superior camera capabilities
- Longer endurance rating
- Higher price tag
- Potentially less battery life (depending on capacity)
- More complex software features
Display Comparison
The provided data lacks detailed display specifications for either device. However, given the Realme 9 Pro+'s positioning, it likely features a higher quality panel with a faster refresh rate than the TCL 30+. The Realme 9 Pro+’s advertised ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio suggests a VA-type panel, potentially offering deeper blacks, while the TCL 30+ likely utilizes an IPS LCD. Without specific brightness (nits) data, it’s difficult to assess outdoor visibility, but Realme typically equips its Pro models with brighter displays.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited, but the Realme 9 Pro+ likely boasts a more capable camera system. While both phones likely feature a primary camera, the Realme 9 Pro+’s chipset includes a more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) for improved image processing. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make definitive claims, but the Realme’s higher-end positioning suggests a larger sensor and wider aperture, resulting in better low-light performance. The TCL 30+ likely relies on software processing to compensate for a less capable sensor.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Realme 9 Pro+'s Mediatek Dimensity 920, built on a 6nm process, is a significant upgrade over the TCL 30+'s 12nm Mediatek Helio G37. The Dimensity 920 features a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A78 cores versus the G37’s Cortex-A53 – resulting in a noticeable improvement in both single-core and multi-core performance. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience. The Dimensity 920’s superior GPU will also deliver a far better gaming experience. The 6nm node also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended use.
Battery Life
The Realme 9 Pro+’s 60W charging is a game-changer. Advertised to reach 100% in just 44 minutes, it significantly reduces charging downtime compared to the TCL 30+'s 18W charging. While the TCL 30+ may have a slightly larger battery capacity (data not provided), the Realme 9 Pro+'s faster charging effectively mitigates any potential battery life disadvantage. The Realme 9 Pro+ also benefits from the Dimensity 920’s improved power efficiency, potentially offsetting any capacity difference. The Realme 9 Pro+’s endurance rating of 117 hours suggests optimized power management.
Buying Guide
Buy the TCL 30+ if you prioritize absolute affordability and are a light user who primarily needs a phone for basic communication, social media, and occasional web browsing. You'll appreciate its lower price point. Buy the Realme 9 Pro+ if you demand smoother multitasking, enjoy mobile gaming, and value the convenience of incredibly fast charging. The performance uplift and charging speed are worth the investment for power users.