TCL 30 5G vs. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its significantly faster 67W charging, capable of a full charge in just 42 minutes, addresses a key pain point for smartphone users. While the TCL 30 5G offers a respectable experience, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s charging speed and slightly brighter display give it a decisive edge.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | TCL 30 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat13 390/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 27 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 11 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 75.2 x 7.7 mm (6.48 x 2.96 x 0.30 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 650 nits (typ), 900 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, TCL UI 4.0 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.3, 19mm (ultrawide), 1/3", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.3, 19mm (ultrawide), 1/3", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5010 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Tech Black, Dreamy Blue | Graphite Gray, Polar White, Atlantic Blue |
| Models | T776H | 21091116I, 2201116SG |
| Price | About 250 EUR | € 120.33 / $ 230.00 / £ 319.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 115h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 288914 (v8), 382902 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
TCL 30 5G
- Potentially more power-efficient chipset (Dimensity 700, 7nm)
- Competitive price point
- 5G connectivity
- Slow 18W charging
- Likely lower display brightness
- Potentially less advanced camera system
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- Ultra-fast 67W charging (PD3.0, QC3)
- Brighter display (746 nits)
- More advanced chipset (Snapdragon 695, 6nm)
- Potentially slightly lower battery endurance due to chipset
- May be slightly more expensive
- Camera details are unknown
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 746 nits. This is a significant advantage for outdoor use, where the TCL 30 5G’s display brightness is not specified, suggesting it will likely struggle in direct sunlight. While both displays have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for AMOLED/OLED panels), the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s higher peak brightness translates to a more vibrant and readable image in various lighting conditions. The absence of refresh rate information for the TCL 30 5G suggests it likely operates at a standard 60Hz, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is expected to have a 120Hz panel, offering smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are missing. However, given the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s positioning, it’s reasonable to expect a more sophisticated camera system, potentially with a larger main sensor and optical image stabilization (OIS). The TCL 30 5G, being a more budget-focused device, likely features a simpler camera setup. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s brand reputation suggests a stronger emphasis on camera performance. We can assume both phones will include standard features like HDR and portrait modes.
Performance
The chipset choice is a key differentiator. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), while the TCL 30 5G features the MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm). While both are 5G capable, the Snapdragon 695, built on a 6nm process, generally offers better power efficiency and sustained performance compared to the 7nm Dimensity 700. Both CPUs feature an octa-core configuration with similar high-performance core clock speeds (2.2 GHz), but the Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores are architecturally more advanced than the Cortex-A76 cores in the Dimensity 700. This translates to a slight edge in single-core performance for the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. The lack of LPDDR RAM specification for both phones makes it difficult to assess memory bandwidth, but the Snapdragon 695’s overall architecture suggests a more robust platform for demanding tasks.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 115 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The TCL 30 5G is limited to 18W wired charging, while the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G supports a blazing-fast 67W wired charging, complete with PD3.0 and QC3 compatibility. This allows the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G to reach 50% charge in just 15 minutes and a full charge in 42 minutes – a massive advantage over the TCL 30 5G’s slower charging speed. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the TCL 30 5G if you prioritize a potentially more efficient chipset in the Mediatek Dimensity 700 and are less concerned with rapid charging. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G if you value blazing-fast 67W charging, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a generally more feature-rich experience, even if it means a slightly less power-efficient chipset.