The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the TCL 30 5G and Samsung Galaxy A14 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at affordable prices, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will delve into their specs, performance, and overall value to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The TCL 30 5G edges out the Galaxy A14 thanks to its superior chipset and 5G connectivity. While the A14 boasts Samsung's brand recognition and potentially a slightly better display, the TCL's performance advantage makes it the better choice for most users seeking a budget 5G phone.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat13 390/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 27 | 2023, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 11 | Available. Released 2023, March 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 75.2 x 7.7 mm (6.48 x 2.96 x 0.30 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 650 nits (typ), 900 nits (peak) | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version AOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version B |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version AExynos 850 (8 nm) - Version B |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, TCL UI 4.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.3, 19mm (ultrawide), 1/3", 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.3, 19mm (ultrawide), 1/3", 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1 or 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5010 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Tech Black, Dreamy Blue | Black, Dark Red, Silver, Green |
| Models | T776H | SM-A145F, SM-A145F/DSN, SM-A145M, SM-A145M/DS, SM-A145P, SM-A145R |
| Price | About 250 EUR | € 85.76 / $ 147.60 / £ 79.95 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.46 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) |
TCL 30 5G
- Faster Processor (Dimensity 700)
- 5G Connectivity
- Generally good value
- Decent Display
- Camera may not be as versatile as A14
- Slower charging (18W)
Samsung Galaxy A14
- Samsung Brand Recognition
- Potentially brighter display
- Versatile Camera System
- Good Battery Life
- Slower Processor (Helio G80/Exynos 850)
- Slower Charging (15W)
- Can feel slightly less premium
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large displays, typically around 6.6 inches. The Galaxy A14 often has a slightly brighter panel, potentially offering better outdoor visibility. However, the TCL 30 5G's display is generally well-regarded for its color accuracy. Resolution is typically FHD+ on both.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A14 typically offers a more versatile camera system with multiple lenses, including a higher-resolution main sensor. While the TCL 30 5G's camera is capable, the A14 often delivers slightly better image quality, especially in well-lit conditions. Low-light performance is generally comparable.
Performance
The TCL 30 5G's Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Galaxy A14's Helio G80 (or Exynos 850). Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the TCL. The Dimensity 700's 7nm process also contributes to better power efficiency.
Battery Life
Both phones feature large batteries (typically 5000mAh), offering all-day battery life. However, the TCL 30 5G's more efficient chipset may give it a slight edge in overall battery endurance.
Buying Guide
The TCL 30 5G is ideal for users prioritizing performance and 5G connectivity on a budget. The Samsung Galaxy A14 is a good fit for those who value Samsung's ecosystem, a potentially brighter display, and a more established brand reputation, even if it means sacrificing some processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The TCL 30 5G's Dimensity 700 chipset provides significantly better gaming performance than the Galaxy A14's Helio G80 or Exynos 850.
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy A14 worth buying if I'm not interested in 5G?
Yes, the Galaxy A14 remains a solid choice if you don't need 5G, offering a reliable Samsung experience and a versatile camera system.