Realme 9 Pro+ vs TCL 30 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing speed and convenience, the Realme 9 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 920 chipset and 60W charging significantly outperform the TCL 30 5G's Dimensity 700 and 18W charging. However, the TCL 30 5G remains a viable option for budget-conscious buyers who don't demand top-tier performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | TCL 30 5G | Realme 9 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat13 390/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 27 | 2022, February 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 11 | Available. Released 2022, February 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 75.2 x 7.7 mm (6.48 x 2.96 x 0.30 in) | 160.2 x 73.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 650 nits (typ), 900 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, TCL UI 4.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.3, 19mm (ultrawide), 1/3", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.3, 19mm (ultrawide), 1/3", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 60W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 44 min (advertised) |
| Type | Li-Po 5010 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Tech Black, Dreamy Blue | Midnight Black, Aurora Green, Sunrise Blue, Free Fire Limited Edition |
| Models | T776H | RMX3392, RMX3393 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | € 289.90 / $ 390.00 / ₹ 25,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.73 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 495096 (v8), 416031 (v9) GeekBench: 2335 (v5.1) GFXBench: 27fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
TCL 30 5G
- More affordable price point
- Reliable 5G connectivity
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Less powerful chipset (Dimensity 700)
- Likely lower quality display
Realme 9 Pro+
- Faster performance (Dimensity 920)
- Ultra-fast 60W charging
- Potentially better camera system
- Higher price tag
- May experience more thermal throttling under sustained load
- Potentially less battery endurance (needs testing)
Display Comparison
The provided data lacks detailed display specifications for either device. However, given the Realme 9 Pro+'s positioning, it likely features a higher quality panel with potentially a higher refresh rate than the TCL 30 5G. The Realme 9 Pro+’s advertised ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio suggests a VA-type panel, potentially offering deeper blacks, while the TCL 30 5G likely uses an IPS LCD. Without specific brightness (nits) data, it’s difficult to definitively state which display is superior, but Realme’s focus on visual experience suggests a more refined display.
Camera Comparison
The provided data doesn't offer sufficient detail for a comprehensive camera comparison. However, the Realme 9 Pro+ is likely to feature a more advanced camera system, potentially with a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The TCL 30 5G likely focuses on providing a functional camera experience without prioritizing cutting-edge features. Without sensor size or aperture information, it's difficult to assess low-light performance, but the Realme’s higher-tier chipset suggests better image signal processing capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 9 Pro+’s Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the TCL 30 5G’s Dimensity 700 (7nm). The 6nm process node inherently offers better power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Furthermore, the Dimensity 920 utilizes Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz, compared to the TCL’s A76 cores at 2.2 GHz. This translates to a noticeable performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. While both phones share the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the Realme’s superior chipset will deliver a smoother and more responsive user experience.
Battery Life
The Realme 9 Pro+ boasts a significant advantage in charging speed with its 60W wired charging, capable of a full charge in a claimed 44 minutes. The TCL 30 5G’s 18W charging is considerably slower. While the Realme 9 Pro+ has an endurance rating of 117 hours, the TCL 30 5G’s battery life is not specified. The faster charging of the Realme 9 Pro+ mitigates any potential battery capacity disadvantage, offering greater convenience for users who frequently need to top up their device.
Buying Guide
Buy the TCL 30 5G if you need a reliable 5G connection on a tight budget and aren't a heavy gamer or power user. It's ideal for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light media consumption. Buy the Realme 9 Pro+ if you prioritize faster performance for gaming and multitasking, and value the convenience of incredibly rapid 60W charging, making it perfect for users constantly on the go.