TCL 30 5G vs. Motorola Moto G51 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Motorola Moto G51 5G edges out the TCL 30 5G thanks to its superior display brightness and exceptional battery life. While the TCL 30 5G boasts a slightly more powerful chipset, the Moto G51 5G's strengths in display and endurance make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | TCL 30 5G | Motorola Moto G51 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Europe, Asia, Saudi Arabia |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 - Europe/Asia |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Europe/Asia |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat13 390/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 27 | 2021, November 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 11 | Available. Released 2021, December 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 75.2 x 7.7 mm (6.48 x 2.96 x 0.30 in) | 170.5 x 76.5 x 9.1 mm (6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 650 nits (typ), 900 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, TCL UI 4.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.3, 19mm (ultrawide), 1/3", 1.12µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.3, 19mm (ultrawide), 1/3", 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm - Global or 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm - China only |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD/Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 20W wired (India) 10W wired (Global) |
| Type | Li-Po 5010 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Tech Black, Dreamy Blue | Indigo Blue, Bright Silver, Aqua Blue |
| Models | T776H | XT2171-2, XT2171-1 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 210 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 124h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1634:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 302859 (v9) GeekBench: 1696 (v5.1) GFXBench: 26fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
TCL 30 5G
- Slightly more powerful chipset
- 5G Connectivity
- Decent display
- Lower display brightness
- Shorter battery life
- Camera performance could be better
Motorola Moto G51 5G
- Excellent battery life (124h endurance)
- Bright display (595 nits)
- Smooth user experience
- 5G Connectivity
- Slightly less powerful chipset
- Camera performance could be better
- Charging speed varies by region
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G51 5G takes a clear lead in the display department. Its measured peak brightness of 595 nits is significantly higher than what's typically seen on the TCL 30 5G, resulting in better visibility outdoors. Both offer a 1634:1 contrast ratio, indicating good black levels, but the Moto G51 5G's brightness advantage is noticeable. The TCL 30 5G's display is adequate but lacks the punch of the Moto G51 5G.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is comparable between the two devices. Both offer decent image quality in good lighting conditions, but struggle in low light. Specific camera specs are not detailed, but both are expected to offer standard features like portrait mode and HDR. The Moto G51 5G might have a slight edge in video recording due to Motorola's software optimization.
Performance
The TCL 30 5G's Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset generally offers slightly better performance than the Snapdragon 480+ 5G in the Moto G51 5G. This translates to marginally faster app loading times and smoother multitasking in some scenarios. However, the difference isn't massive, and both phones are capable of handling everyday tasks without issue. Gaming performance is also slightly better on the TCL 30 5G.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G51 5G absolutely dominates in battery life. Its endurance rating of 124 hours is exceptional, significantly outperforming the TCL 30 5G. This means you can easily get multiple days of use on a single charge with the Moto G51 5G, while the TCL 30 5G will likely require daily charging.
Buying Guide
The TCL 30 5G is a good option for users prioritizing raw processing power for gaming or demanding apps. The Motorola Moto G51 5G is ideal for those who value a vibrant display, long battery life, and a smooth user experience for everyday tasks.