Poco X3 Pro vs TCL 20L+: Which Budget Phone Reigns Supreme?

The TCL 20L+ and Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro represent distinct approaches to the budget smartphone market. The TCL aims for a well-rounded experience, while the Poco X3 Pro aggressively prioritizes performance, particularly for gaming. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which aligns with your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 860 chipset provides a substantial performance leap over the TCL 20L+'s Snapdragon 662, making it ideal for gaming and demanding applications. While the TCL offers a more balanced package, the Poco’s raw power is hard to ignore.

PHONES
Phone Names TCL 20L+ Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - EU/MEA/APACHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - EU/MEA/APAC1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International
SpeedHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat6 300/50 MbpsHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
 -1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India
Launch
Announced2021, April 142021, March 22
StatusAvailable. Released 2021, April 14Available. Released 2021, March 24
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic back, plastic frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back
Dimensions166.2 x 76.9 x 9.1 mm (6.54 x 3.03 x 0.36 in)165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in)
SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight199 g (7.02 oz)215 g (7.58 oz)
 -IP53, dust and splash resistant
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 6
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)
Size6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio)6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 500 nits (peak)IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver)Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver)
ChipsetQualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm)
GPUAdreno 610Adreno 640
OSAndroid 11, TCL UIAndroid 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal256GB 6GB RAM128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
 -UFS 3.1
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaDual-LED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Single-20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm
Video1080p@30/60fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR, panorama
Single16 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm
Video1080p@30/60fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -Yes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
 -24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX5.0, A2DP, LE
Infrared port-Yes
NFCYesYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioUnspecifiedFM radio, recording
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging18W wired33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min
TypeLi-Po 5000 mAhLi-Po 5160 mAh
Misc
ColorsMilky Way Gray, North Star BluePhantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze
ModelsT775H, T775BM2102J20SG, M2102J20SI
PriceAbout 270 EUR$ 128.04 / £ 249.99
SAR-0.99 W/kg (head)     0.67 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.57 W/kg (head)     0.90 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 112h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -26.1 LUFS (Good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 453223 (v8) GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1) GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

TCL 20L+

  • Potentially more refined software experience (TCL)
  • Balanced feature set for everyday use
  • Adequate performance for basic tasks

  • Significantly weaker performance compared to Poco X3 Pro
  • Slower charging speed (18W)
  • Limited gaming capabilities

Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro

  • Exceptional performance for the price (Snapdragon 860)
  • Fast charging (33W)
  • Excellent gaming capabilities

  • Potentially more aggressive software (Xiaomi)
  • May prioritize performance over battery optimization
  • Camera details are unknown

Display Comparison

Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and panel type are missing for the TCL 20L+. Given the Poco X3 Pro’s focus on gaming, it’s likely to have a higher peak brightness for better outdoor visibility. The TCL’s display quality will likely be adequate for everyday use, but the Poco has the potential for a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience.

Camera Comparison

Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are absent. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the Poco X3 Pro’s overall focus on delivering value, it’s reasonable to assume it will offer a more capable camera system, potentially with larger sensors and more advanced image processing. The TCL 20L+ will likely provide acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions, but may struggle in low-light scenarios.

Performance

The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Poco X3 Pro’s Snapdragon 860 (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the TCL 20L+'s Snapdragon 662 (11nm). The 860 features a Kryo 485 core clocked at 2.96 GHz, compared to the 662’s 2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold core. This translates to significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a far superior gaming experience. The 7nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The TCL 20L+ will handle basic tasks adequately, but will struggle with graphically intensive games.

Battery Life

Both devices boast an endurance rating of 112 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the Poco X3 Pro’s 33W wired charging (59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min) is a significant advantage over the TCL 20L+'s 18W charging. This means the Poco can be quickly topped up, minimizing downtime. While both offer similar longevity, the Poco’s faster charging provides greater convenience.

Buying Guide

Buy the TCL 20L+ if you prioritize a balanced, everyday experience with adequate performance for social media, browsing, and light tasks, and value a potentially more refined software experience. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro if you are a mobile gamer, frequently use demanding apps, or simply want the fastest possible performance for the price, and are willing to accept a potentially more aggressive software approach.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Poco X3 Pro's Snapdragon 860 likely to throttle during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 860 is a powerful chip, throttling is always a possibility during prolonged, demanding tasks. However, the 7nm process node and the Poco X3 Pro’s cooling system are designed to mitigate this. Expect some performance reduction after extended gaming, but it should remain playable.
❓ Does the TCL 20L+ have a headphone jack?
While not explicitly stated in the provided specs, TCL generally includes a 3.5mm headphone jack in their budget and mid-range devices. It's highly probable the 20L+ also features one, offering convenience for users with wired headphones.
❓ What kind of software experience can I expect from the Poco X3 Pro?
The Poco X3 Pro runs Xiaomi's MIUI, which is known for its extensive customization options and feature set. However, it also includes pre-installed apps (bloatware) and can be more aggressive with notifications. It's a feature-rich experience, but may not appeal to those who prefer a cleaner Android interface.