TCL 205 vs. Samsung Galaxy A03 Core: A Deep Dive into the Sub-$150 Smartphone Market

The TCL 205 and Samsung Galaxy A03 Core represent the absolute bottom end of the smartphone price spectrum. Both devices aim to deliver basic smartphone functionality at an incredibly low cost. However, despite similar price points, subtle differences in software and potential build quality can make one a better choice than the other for specific users. This comparison dissects their shared hardware and explores where each phone attempts to differentiate itself.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing a slightly cleaner software experience and potential for longer software support, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core edges out the TCL 205. However, the TCL 205 isn't a bad choice, especially if found at a significantly lower price point, as the core hardware is identical.

PHONES
Phone Names TCL 205 Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 411, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 MbpsHSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2021, October 082021, November 15
StatusAvailable. Released 2021, OctoberAvailable. Released 2021, December 06
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic frame, plastic backPlastic back, plastic frame
Dimensions159.2 x 75.2 x 8.7 mm (6.27 x 2.96 x 0.34 in)164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight170.3 g (6.00 oz)211 g (7.44 oz)
Display
Resolution720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~270 ppi density)720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density)
Size6.22 inches, 96.6 cm2 (~80.7% screen-to-body ratio)6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDPLS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetUnisoc SC9863A (28 nm)Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm)
GPUIMG8322IMG8322
OSAndroid 11 (Go edition), TCL UIAndroid 11 (Go edition)
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal32GB 2GB RAM32GB 2GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
Dual13 MP, f/2.2, (wide) 1/3.06", 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens-
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash
Single5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) 1/5.0", 1.12µm8 MP, f/2.0, AF
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR-
Single5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) 1/5.0", 1.12µm5 MP, f/2.2
Video1080p@30fps-
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP4.2, A2DP
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPSGPS, GLONASS
RadioNoUnspecified
USBmicroUSB 2.0microUSB 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, proximityAccelerometer, proximity
Battery
TypeLi-Po 4000 mAhLi-Ion 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsPower Gray, Atlantic BlueBlack, Blue
Models4187DSM-A032F, SM-A032F/DS, SM-A032M
PriceAbout 110 EUR£ 74.99
SAR-0.30 W/kg (head)
SAR EU-0.24 W/kg (head)     1.39 W/kg (body)

TCL 205

  • Potentially lower price point
  • Identical core performance to A03 Core
  • May offer more storage options (depending on variant)

  • Likely more pre-installed bloatware
  • Potentially less frequent software updates
  • Brand recognition is lower than Samsung

Samsung Galaxy A03 Core

  • Cleaner software experience
  • Samsung brand reputation
  • Potentially better software update support

  • May be slightly more expensive
  • Identical core performance to TCL 205
  • Similar camera limitations

Display Comparison

Both the TCL 205 and Samsung Galaxy A03 Core utilize displays that prioritize cost savings over quality. Given the lack of detailed display specifications, we can assume both feature LCD panels with resolutions likely around 720 x 1600 pixels. The 28nm Unisoc chipset will limit the ability to drive high refresh rates, so both are likely capped at 60Hz. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, maximizing screen real estate within a compact form factor. Color accuracy and brightness are likely to be average, suitable for indoor use but potentially washed out in direct sunlight.

Camera Comparison

Camera performance on both devices will be limited by the hardware and image processing capabilities of the Unisoc chipset. While specifications are not fully available, it's reasonable to expect a primary camera sensor around 8-13 megapixels on each phone. Any additional cameras, such as macro or depth sensors, are likely to be low resolution (2MP) and offer limited practical benefit. Image quality will be acceptable in good lighting conditions, but will suffer in low light. Expect limited dynamic range and detail. The image processing style will likely differ between TCL and Samsung, potentially resulting in different color profiles and levels of sharpening.

Performance

The core of both devices is the Unisoc SC9863A chipset, fabricated on a 28nm process. This chipset features an octa-core CPU configuration with four cores clocked at 1.6 GHz (Cortex-A55) and four cores at 1.2 GHz (Cortex-A55). This architecture is designed for efficiency rather than raw power, making it suitable for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light web browsing. The shared chipset means performance will be virtually identical between the two phones. RAM capacity, which is not specified, will be a key determinant of multitasking capability; more RAM will allow for more apps to remain open in the background. Thermal management is unlikely to be a concern given the low power draw of the SC9863A.

Battery Life

Battery capacity is a critical factor for budget smartphones. While specific mAh ratings are unavailable, both devices likely feature batteries in the 4000-5000 mAh range. Given the power efficiency of the Unisoc SC9863A and the low-resolution displays, both phones should be capable of lasting a full day on a single charge with moderate usage. Charging wattage is likely to be low (5W-10W), resulting in relatively slow charging times. Expect a full 0-100% charge to take several hours.

Buying Guide

Buy the TCL 205 if you need a functional smartphone for the absolute lowest possible price and are comfortable with potentially more pre-installed bloatware. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core if you prefer a more streamlined Android experience, potentially benefit from Samsung's software update track record (even on this budget tier), and value brand recognition. Both are suitable for basic communication and light app usage.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will either of these phones struggle with popular apps like WhatsApp or Facebook?
While both phones can run apps like WhatsApp and Facebook, performance will be limited. Expect slower loading times and occasional lag, especially when multitasking. These phones are best suited for basic app usage and are not ideal for demanding applications.
❓ Are these phones compatible with 5G networks?
No, both the TCL 205 and Samsung Galaxy A03 Core are 4G LTE devices. They do not support 5G connectivity due to the limitations of the Unisoc SC9863A chipset and their target price point.
❓ How much storage do these phones typically come with, and can it be expanded?
These phones typically ship with 32GB or 64GB of internal storage. Both devices likely include a microSD card slot for storage expansion, allowing users to add up to 512GB or 1TB of additional storage.
❓ What version of Android do these phones run, and will they receive updates?
Both phones likely run Android Go Edition, a lightweight version of Android designed for devices with limited resources. Software update support is limited on these budget devices, but Samsung generally provides slightly longer support than other brands in this segment.