TCL 20 R 5G vs Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its 67W charging, capable of a full charge in just 41 minutes, significantly outperforms the TCL 20 R 5G’s sluggish 10W charging. While both share an endurance rating of 119 hours, the Poco’s faster refueling makes it more practical for power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | TCL 20 R 5G | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat13 400/100 Mbps, 5G 2.7 Gbps DL | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 07 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 23 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75 x 9 mm (6.47 x 2.95 x 0.35 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 500 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, TCL UI | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | T767H | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 180 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.8 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
TCL 20 R 5G
- Potentially lower upfront cost
- Functional 5G connectivity
- Acceptable battery endurance
- Extremely slow 10W charging
- Less efficient 7nm chipset
- Likely inferior camera performance
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- 67W fast charging (PD3.0, QC3)
- More efficient 6nm Snapdragon 695
- Potentially better sustained performance
- May be slightly more expensive
- Camera details are unknown
- Software experience can be bloated (typical Xiaomi)
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given TCL’s history with display technology, it’s plausible the 20 R 5G might offer slightly better color accuracy, but the Poco X4 Pro’s larger screen size (assumed, based on market positioning) could provide a more immersive viewing experience. Without concrete data, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering little insight. Without sensor size or aperture information, a detailed comparison is impossible. However, the market segment suggests the Poco X4 Pro likely features a more sophisticated camera system, potentially with a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. The TCL 20 R 5G likely prioritizes affordability over camera quality. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality.
Performance
The Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) holds a clear architectural advantage over the TCL 20 R 5G’s MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The 6nm process generally translates to improved power efficiency and potentially less thermal throttling under sustained load. While both CPUs feature a 2x2.2 GHz core configuration, the Snapdragon utilizes Kryo 660 Gold cores, which are architecturally more advanced than the Cortex-A76 cores in the Dimensity 700. This suggests the Poco X4 Pro will handle demanding applications and multitasking more smoothly. The Dimensity 700 is still capable, but the Snapdragon 695 offers a more modern foundation.
Battery Life
Both the TCL 20 R 5G and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G achieve an endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The TCL 20 R 5G’s 10W charging is exceptionally slow, requiring significant downtime to replenish the battery. Conversely, the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, can reach 70% charge in just 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes. This rapid charging capability is a game-changer for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the TCL 20 R 5G if your primary concern is minimizing upfront cost and you rarely need to rapidly recharge your phone. It’s a functional 5G device for basic tasks. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you value fast charging, potentially better sustained performance due to the more efficient 6nm process, and a more future-proofed chipset, even if the core performance difference isn't massive.