TCL 20 5G vs. Motorola Moto G53: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Motorola Moto G53 edges out the TCL 20 5G thanks to its brighter display, potentially better camera performance, and reverse charging. While the TCL 20 5G boasts a slightly more powerful chipset, the Moto G53's overall package provides a more compelling value proposition.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | TCL 20 5G | Motorola Moto G53 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - EMEA & AP, China |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42 - EMEA & AP |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - EMEA & AP |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, November 30. Released 2020, December 07 | 2022, December 15 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, December 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 166.2 x 76.8 x 9.1 mm (6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 in) | 162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| - | Water-resistant design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619L | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, TCL UI | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm or 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC4 | 18W wired (China, LATAM) 10W wired (International) Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mist Gray, Placid Blue | Ink Blue, Arctic Silver, Pale Pink |
| Models | T781, T781K, T781H | XT2335-2 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | $ 295.00 / £ 143.15 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 123h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1746:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.0 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 314195 (v9) GeekBench: 1594 (v5.1), 1797 (v6.0) GFXBench: 29fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
TCL 20 5G
- Slightly more powerful chipset
- Potentially more premium build quality
- 5G Connectivity
- Less bright display
- Potentially shorter battery life
- Charging speed could be faster
Motorola Moto G53
- Brighter display
- Exceptional battery life
- Reverse wired charging
- Good value for money
- Slightly less powerful chipset
- Charging speed varies by region (10W in some areas)
- Plastic build
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G53 takes a clear lead in the display department. Its measured 599 nits peak brightness significantly surpasses what's typically expected from the TCL 20 5G, resulting in better visibility outdoors. Both offer a high contrast ratio (1746:1), but the Moto G53's brightness makes a noticeable difference. The TCL 20 5G's display is adequate, but not as impressive.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is difficult to definitively declare a winner without extensive testing. Both phones feature standard camera setups. The Moto G53's camera is likely to benefit from Motorola's image processing, potentially resulting in more pleasing photos. The TCL 20 5G's camera is decent, but may lack the Moto G53's refinements.
Performance
The TCL 20 5G holds a slight advantage in performance thanks to its Snapdragon 690 chipset, which is generally considered more powerful than the Moto G53's Snapdragon 480+ 5G. This translates to slightly smoother performance in demanding apps and games. However, in everyday use, the difference might not be immediately apparent.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G53 shines with its exceptional endurance rating of 123 hours. This indicates significantly longer battery life compared to the TCL 20 5G. The TCL 20 5G's battery life is respectable, but not as impressive as the Moto G53's.
Buying Guide
The TCL 20 5G is a good choice for users prioritizing raw processing power and a slightly more premium feel. The Motorola Moto G53 is ideal for those who value a vibrant display, long battery life, and the added convenience of reverse charging, especially if you're in a region with the 18W charging variant.