TCL 20 5G vs Motorola Moto G 5G: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing slightly better performance and a marginally faster charging experience, the Motorola Moto G 5G is the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 750G offers a noticeable, though not massive, uplift over the TCL 20 5G’s Snapdragon 690, making it better suited for demanding apps and games.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | TCL 20 5G | Motorola Moto G 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, November 30. Released 2020, December 07 | 2020, November 05. Released 2020, December 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 166.2 x 76.8 x 9.1 mm (6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 in) | 166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9 mm (6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619L | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, TCL UI | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 2GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 2 MP (macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC4 | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mist Gray, Placid Blue | Volcanic Gray, Frosted Silver |
| Models | T781, T781K, T781H | - |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 90 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 131h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1419:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.1 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 312461 (v8) GeekBench: 1980 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
TCL 20 5G
- Potential for strong display quality based on TCL's expertise.
- QC4 fast charging compatibility.
- Competitive 5G connectivity.
- Slightly less powerful processor compared to the Moto G 5G.
- Limited information on camera specifications.
Motorola Moto G 5G
- Faster Snapdragon 750G processor for improved performance.
- 20W fast charging for quicker top-ups.
- Established brand reputation.
- Identical battery endurance rating to the TCL 20 5G.
- Display brightness is not class-leading.
Display Comparison
Both devices share a 1419:1 contrast ratio, indicating similar levels of black depth and overall image quality. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 484 nits, which, while not exceptional, provides a slightly more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the TCL 20 5G (brightness data unavailable). Without knowing the TCL 20 5G’s peak brightness, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Moto G 5G’s measured value gives it a slight edge. Both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, common in this price bracket, and lack high refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is impossible. However, given Motorola’s history of competent camera software, and the slightly more powerful ISP within the Snapdragon 750G, the Moto G 5G likely delivers marginally better image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The absence of information regarding OIS or advanced features makes it difficult to assess the true camera capabilities of either device.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the TCL 20 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, built on an 8nm process, while the Motorola Moto G 5G features the Snapdragon 750G 5G, also on 8nm. The 750G’s CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 cores versus the 690’s 2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold cores – translates to a roughly 10% performance increase in CPU-intensive tasks. The 750G’s Adreno 619 GPU also offers a performance advantage over the 690’s Adreno 619L, making the Moto G 5G more capable for gaming. While both use 8nm fabrication, the architectural improvements in the 750G provide a tangible benefit.
Battery Life
Both the TCL 20 5G and Motorola Moto G 5G achieve an endurance rating of 131 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. The Motorola Moto G 5G offers 20W wired charging, slightly faster than the TCL 20 5G’s 18W charging with QC4 support. This translates to a quicker 0-100% charge time for the Moto G 5G, a convenience factor for users who prioritize rapid replenishment.
Buying Guide
Buy the TCL 20 5G if you prioritize a brand with a growing reputation for display technology and are comfortable with a slightly less powerful processor. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G if you prefer a more established brand in the mobile space and want a phone that can handle multitasking and gaming with a bit more headroom, benefitting from the Snapdragon 750G’s improved CPU and GPU.