TCL 10 Pro vs Realme X50 Pro Player: A Performance and Value Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Realme X50 Pro Player is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset delivers a substantially faster experience, especially in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. However, the TCL 10 Pro remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget who prioritize efficiency and a more balanced feature set.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | TCL 10 Pro | Realme X50 Pro Player |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - T799B | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - T799B | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/75 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - T799H | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 06. Released 2020, May 19 | 2020, May 25. Released 2020, June 01 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Unspecified), glass back (Unspecified), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 72.4 x 9.2 mm (6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 in) | 159 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 177 g (6.24 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Unspecified |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.47 inches, 102.8 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, HDR10 | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Always-on-display | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 612 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, planned upgrade to Android 11, TCL UI | Android 10, Realme UI |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 16 MP, f/2.4, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240/960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, 29mm (standard), 1/3.06", 1.0µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 24 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.9µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC3, 50% in 35 min | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Green | Light Speed Silver, Phantom Black |
| Models | T799B, T799H | RMX2072 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 350 EUR |
TCL 10 Pro
- More affordable price point
- Potentially better battery efficiency due to less powerful chipset
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Significantly slower performance compared to the Realme X50 Pro Player
- Slower charging speeds
- Less future-proof
Realme X50 Pro Player
- Exceptional performance thanks to the Snapdragon 865
- Ultra-fast 65W charging
- 5G connectivity
- Higher price tag
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy use
- May run warmer under sustained load
Display Comparison
While specific display specs beyond resolution aren't provided, the Realme X50 Pro Player, being a flagship-focused device, likely features a higher peak brightness and potentially a higher refresh rate panel than the TCL 10 Pro. The TCL 10 Pro's display quality is likely adequate for everyday use, but the Realme's display is geared towards a more immersive and responsive experience. The difference in chipset power also means the Realme can more effectively drive a higher resolution or refresh rate display without significant performance impact.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it's difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Realme X50 Pro Player, as a flagship contender, likely incorporates a more sophisticated camera system with a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The Snapdragon 865 also boasts a more powerful image signal processor (ISP), enabling faster image processing and improved low-light performance. While the TCL 10 Pro may offer decent image quality in good lighting conditions, the Realme is expected to deliver superior results across a wider range of scenarios.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The TCL 10 Pro's Snapdragon 675 (11nm) is a capable mid-range processor, but it's significantly outmatched by the Realme X50 Pro Player's Snapdragon 865 (7nm+). The 865 utilizes newer Cortex-A77 cores and a more advanced manufacturing process, resulting in substantially higher CPU and GPU performance. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a far superior gaming experience. The 7nm+ process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, though the 865's higher performance will still generate more heat under sustained load. The Realme's likely use of faster LPDDR5 RAM further enhances performance compared to the TCL's likely LPDDR4X.
Battery Life
The TCL 10 Pro offers 18W wired charging with Quick Charge 3.0, achieving 50% charge in 35 minutes. The Realme X50 Pro Player, however, boasts a blazing-fast 65W SuperDart charging, reaching 100% in the same 35 minutes. This is a massive difference in convenience. While battery capacity isn't specified, the Realme's faster charging mitigates any potential disadvantage from a smaller battery size. The Snapdragon 865 is also more power-hungry, so the Realme's charging advantage is crucial for maintaining usability throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the TCL 10 Pro if you need a reliable daily driver for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and light photography, and value a more conservative battery drain profile. Buy the Realme X50 Pro Player if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, 5G connectivity, and significantly faster charging speeds, and are willing to accept potentially higher power consumption.