TCL 10 Pro vs Oppo Find X2 Neo: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Oppo Find X2 Neo is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 765G chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift over the TCL 10 Pro’s Snapdragon 675, coupled with faster 30W charging. While both phones offer similar battery endurance ratings, the Find X2 Neo’s faster charging mitigates any potential concerns.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | TCL 10 Pro | Oppo Find X2 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - T799B | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - T799B | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 78 NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/75 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G 3.7/1.6 Gbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - T799H | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 06. Released 2020, May 19 | 2020, April 15. Released 2020, May 21 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 72.4 x 9.2 mm (6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 in) | 159.4 x 72.4 x 7.7 mm (6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 177 g (6.24 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.47 inches, 102.8 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, HDR10 | AMOLED, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ) |
| Always-on-display | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 612 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, planned upgrade to Android 11, TCL UI | Android 10, ColorOS 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 16 MP, f/2.4, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 53mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 24 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.9µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC3, 50% in 35 min | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4025 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Green | Moonlight Black, Starry Blue |
| Models | T799B, T799H | CPH2009 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 240 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 308231 (v8) GeekBench: 1815(v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
TCL 10 Pro
- More affordable price point
- Reliable performance for basic tasks
- Decent battery endurance
- Older Snapdragon 675 chipset
- Slower 18W charging
- Lacks 5G connectivity
Oppo Find X2 Neo
- Faster Snapdragon 765G chipset
- 30W fast charging
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Potentially higher price
- May experience slight thermal throttling under heavy load
- Software updates may be less frequent than TCL
Display Comparison
Both the TCL 10 Pro and Oppo Find X2 Neo advertise an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting both utilize AMOLED panels. However, specific details like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. The Find X2 Neo’s display benefits from the more powerful ISP within the Snapdragon 765G, potentially leading to more accurate color reproduction. Without further data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Find X2 Neo’s chipset suggests a more refined visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are lacking for both devices. However, the Snapdragon 765G in the Oppo Find X2 Neo offers a more advanced Image Signal Processor (ISP) capable of handling more complex image processing tasks. This could result in better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The TCL 10 Pro’s 675 chipset, while capable, is limited in its processing capabilities compared to the 765G. Without specific sensor details, the Find X2 Neo likely holds an advantage.
Performance
The Oppo Find X2 Neo’s Snapdragon 765G represents a significant step up from the TCL 10 Pro’s Snapdragon 675. The 765G’s Kryo 475 Prime core, clocked at 2.4 GHz, provides a substantial performance boost over the 675’s 2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold cores. Furthermore, the 7nm process node of the 765G is more efficient than the 11nm node of the 675, resulting in better thermal management and sustained performance. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the Find X2 Neo.
Battery Life
Both devices boast a 100-hour endurance rating, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the Oppo Find X2 Neo’s 30W wired charging significantly outperforms the TCL 10 Pro’s 18W charging. The Find X2 Neo can reach 50% charge in just 20 minutes, while the TCL 10 Pro takes 35 minutes. This faster charging speed is a crucial advantage for users who prioritize minimizing downtime and quickly topping up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the TCL 10 Pro if you need a reliable, budget-friendly device for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light media consumption, and aren't concerned with 5G connectivity. Buy the Oppo Find X2 Neo if you prioritize smoother multitasking, gaming, and the benefits of 5G, and value faster charging speeds for minimizing downtime.