TCL 10 5G vs Motorola Moto G 5G: Which 5G Phone Delivers More?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and slightly faster charging, the TCL 10 5G emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 765G, while built on a 7nm process, offers a performance edge over the 8nm Snapdragon 750G in the Moto G 5G, particularly in graphically intensive tasks. However, the Moto G 5G’s display brightness is a notable advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | TCL 10 5G | Motorola Moto G 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - T790Y | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 - T790Y | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA - T790Y | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat16 1000/150 Mbps, 5G 2.3 Gbps DL | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 41, 42 - T790H | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 06. Released 2020, July 27 | 2020, November 05. Released 2020, December 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 76.6 x 9 mm (6.44 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9 mm (6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, TCL UI | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 2GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 2 MP (macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC3 | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Chrome Blue, Mercury Gray | Volcanic Gray, Frosted Silver |
| Models | T790Y, T790H | - |
| Price | About 400 EUR | About 90 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 131h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1419:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.1 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 312461 (v8) GeekBench: 1980 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
TCL 10 5G
- Potentially better sustained performance with Snapdragon 765G
- Faster CPU prime core clock speed (2.4 GHz)
- Quick Charge 3.0 support
- Lower peak display brightness (data unavailable)
- Potentially less efficient 7nm process compared to 8nm
Motorola Moto G 5G
- Higher peak display brightness (484 nits)
- Slightly faster 20W charging
- Endurance rating of 131h
- Snapdragon 750G offers slightly lower peak performance
- 8nm process may result in slightly higher power consumption
Display Comparison
Both the TCL 10 5G and Motorola Moto G 5G share a contrast ratio of 1419:1, indicating similar levels of black depth and color vibrancy. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 484 nits, a significant advantage over the TCL 10 5G (brightness data unavailable). This higher brightness translates to improved visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize LCD panels given the price point, the Moto G 5G’s superior brightness makes it the more practical choice for outdoor users. The lack of high refresh rate support on either device is typical for this segment, but noticeable compared to higher-end alternatives.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the market positioning, it’s likely both rely on similar-tier sensors. The absence of detailed camera specs suggests neither phone is a standout performer in photography, focusing instead on providing adequate image capture for social media and casual use. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device is likely a marketing feature with limited real-world utility.
Performance
The TCL 10 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7nm) and the Motorola Moto G 5G’s Snapdragon 750G (8nm) represent different approaches to 5G mid-range performance. The 765G features a Kryo 475 CPU with a prime core clocked at 2.4 GHz, alongside a Gold core at 2.2 GHz and six Silver cores at 1.8 GHz. The Moto G 5G’s 750G utilizes Kryo 570 cores, with two performance cores at 2.2 GHz and six efficiency cores at 1.8 GHz. While the 750G benefits from a newer architecture and 8nm process, the 765G’s higher prime core clock speed and the 7nm process generally translate to better sustained performance, especially in gaming. The 765G’s Adreno 620 GPU also offers a slight edge over the 750G’s Adreno 619.
Battery Life
Both the TCL 10 5G and Motorola Moto G 5G achieve an endurance rating of 131 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. The TCL 10 5G supports 18W Quick Charge 3.0 wired charging, while the Moto G 5G offers 20W wired charging. This 2W difference, while seemingly small, could result in slightly faster charging times for the Moto G 5G, potentially shaving off a few minutes from a 0-100% charge. However, the efficiency of the chipset and software optimization will ultimately determine real-world charging speeds.
Buying Guide
Buy the TCL 10 5G if you frequently engage in mobile gaming or demanding applications and value a chipset known for its balanced performance. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G if you prioritize display visibility in bright outdoor conditions and appreciate a slightly longer battery endurance rating, even if it comes with a minor performance trade-off. Both phones are excellent choices for budget-conscious 5G adopters.