TCL 10 5G vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: A Deep Dive into the Snapdragon 765G Experience
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing software experience and camera quality, the Google Pixel 4a 5G is the superior choice. While the TCL 10 5G offers a comparable chipset, the Pixel’s optimized software and superior image processing provide a more refined and enjoyable daily experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | TCL 10 5G | Google Pixel 4a 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - T790Y | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 - T790Y | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA - T790Y | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 28, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 Sub6, mmWave (market dependant) |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat16 1000/150 Mbps, 5G 2.3 Gbps DL | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 41, 42 - T790H | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 06. Released 2020, July 27 | 2020, September 30 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, November 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 76.6 x 9 mm (6.44 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 153.9 x 74 x 8.2 mm (Sub-6) or 8.5 mm (Sub-6 and mmWave) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 168 g (5G Sub-6); 171 g ( 5G Sub-6 and mmWave) (5.93 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~413 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.2 inches, 95.7 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, TCL UI | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 107˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC3 | 18W wired, PD2.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 3885 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Chrome Blue, Mercury Gray | Just Black, Clearly White |
| Models | T790Y, T790H | GD1YQ, G025I, G025E, G025H, G6QU3 |
| Price | About 400 EUR | About 140 EUR |
TCL 10 5G
- Wider charger compatibility with QC3.
- Potentially larger display size.
- Likely more affordable price point.
- Less refined software experience.
- Inferior camera image processing.
- Slower software updates.
Google Pixel 4a 5G
- Superior camera performance and image processing.
- Clean and optimized Android experience.
- Guaranteed software updates from Google.
- Potentially smaller display.
- PD2.0 charging requires compatible chargers.
- Generally higher price.
Display Comparison
Both devices lack detailed display specifications in the provided data. However, given the TCL 10 5G’s brand positioning, it likely features a larger display, potentially with a higher refresh rate than the Pixel 4a 5G. The Pixel 4a 5G, consistent with Google’s focus on color accuracy, likely prioritizes accurate color reproduction over sheer size. The absence of LTPO or OLED details suggests both utilize standard LCD panels, impacting contrast ratios and power efficiency compared to more advanced technologies.
Camera Comparison
The provided data doesn’t detail camera specifications beyond the chipsets’ ISP capabilities. However, Google’s Pixel line is renowned for its computational photography prowess. The Pixel 4a 5G likely employs sophisticated algorithms to enhance image quality, particularly in low-light conditions, exceeding the TCL 10 5G’s capabilities. While TCL has improved its camera offerings, it doesn’t match Google’s software-driven image processing. The absence of OIS details suggests both may rely heavily on software stabilization.
Performance
Both the TCL 10 5G and Google Pixel 4a 5G are powered by the Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with identical clock speeds (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver). This means raw processing power will be nearly identical. Performance differences will stem from software optimization and thermal management. Google’s streamlined Android experience typically results in smoother multitasking and faster app launches. While both devices likely utilize LPDDR4X RAM, the Pixel’s software optimizations will likely yield a more responsive user experience.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified, but the charging technology is a key differentiator. The TCL 10 5G supports 18W wired charging with Quick Charge 3.0 (QC3), offering broad compatibility with existing chargers. The Google Pixel 4a 5G utilizes 18W wired charging with Power Delivery 2.0 (PD2.0). While both are 18W, PD2.0 is a more modern standard offering potentially more efficient charging and better compatibility with newer chargers. The actual 0-100% charge time will depend on the battery capacity of each device, but the PD2.0 standard on the Pixel may offer a slight edge in efficiency.
Buying Guide
Buy the TCL 10 5G if you need a larger display and prioritize quick charging compatibility with a wider range of chargers. Buy the Google Pixel 4a 5G if you prefer a cleaner Android experience, exceptional camera performance, and guaranteed software updates directly from Google.